Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

FALSE-NEGATIVE RESULTS OF INITIAL RT-PCR ASSAYS FOR COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

View ORCID ProfileIngrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Diana Buitrago-Garcia, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Paula Zambrano-Achig, Rosa Del Campo, Agustín Ciapponi, Omar Sued, Laura Martínez-García, Anne Rutjes, View ORCID ProfileNicola Low, Jose A Perez-Molina, Javier Zamora
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.20066787
Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
1Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
  • For correspondence: ingrid.arevalo@salud.madrid.org
Diana Buitrago-Garcia
2Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Switzerland
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Simancas-Racines
3Centro de investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC). Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud “Eugenio Espejo”, Universidad UTE, Ecuador
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula Zambrano-Achig
3Centro de investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC). Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud “Eugenio Espejo”, Universidad UTE, Ecuador
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosa Del Campo
5Department of Microbiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agustín Ciapponi
6Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omar Sued
7Fundación Huésped, Buenos Aires, Argentina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Martínez-García
8Department of Microbiology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Rutjes
2Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Switzerland
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola Low
2Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Switzerland
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicola Low
Jose A Perez-Molina
11National Referral Centre for Tropical Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Insituto Ramón y Cajal de Investgación Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Javier Zamora
1Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
13Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London (UK)
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Cases with negative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results at initial testing for suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and found to be positive in a subsequent test, are considered as RT-PCR false-negative cases. False-negative cases have important implications for COVID-19 management, isolation, and risk of transmission. We aimed to review and critically appraise evidence about the proportion of RT-PCR false-negatives at initial testing for COVID-19.

Methods We performed a systematic review and critical appraisal of literature with high involvement of stakeholders in the review process. We searched on MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the WHO database of COVID-19 publications, the EPPI-Centre living systematic map of evidence about COVID-19, and the living systematic review developed by the University of Bern (ISPM). Two authors screened and selected studies according to the eligibility criteria and collected data of included studies (no-independent verification). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. We calculated the false-negative proportion with the corresponding 95% CI using a multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression model using STATA 16®. Certainty of the evidence about false-negative cases was rated using the GRADE approach for tests and strategies. The information is current up to 6 April 2020.

Findings Five studies enrolling 957 patients were included. All studies were affected by several biases and applicability concerns. Pooled estimation of false-negative proportion was 0.085 (95% CI= 0.034 to 0.196; tau-squared = 1.08; 95% CI= 0.27 to 8.28; p<0.001); however, this estimation is highly affected by unexplained heterogeneity, and its interpretation should be avoided. The certainty of the evidence was judged as very low, due to the risk of bias, indirectness, and inconsistency issues.

Conclusions The collected evidence has several limitations, including risk of bias issues, high heterogeneity, and concerns about its applicability. Nonetheless, our findings reinforce the need for repeated testing in patients with suspicion of SARS-Cov-2 infection given that up to 29% of patients could have an initial RT-PCR false-negative result.

Systematic review registration Protocol available on OSF website: https://osf.io/gp38w/

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://tinyurl.com/vvbgqya

Funding Statement

No external funding received

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The study protocol is available online at https://tinyurl.com/vvbgqya. Most included studies are publically available. Additional data are available upon reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 21, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FALSE-NEGATIVE RESULTS OF INITIAL RT-PCR ASSAYS FOR COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
FALSE-NEGATIVE RESULTS OF INITIAL RT-PCR ASSAYS FOR COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Diana Buitrago-Garcia, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Paula Zambrano-Achig, Rosa Del Campo, Agustín Ciapponi, Omar Sued, Laura Martínez-García, Anne Rutjes, Nicola Low, Jose A Perez-Molina, Javier Zamora
medRxiv 2020.04.16.20066787; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.20066787
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
FALSE-NEGATIVE RESULTS OF INITIAL RT-PCR ASSAYS FOR COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Diana Buitrago-Garcia, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Paula Zambrano-Achig, Rosa Del Campo, Agustín Ciapponi, Omar Sued, Laura Martínez-García, Anne Rutjes, Nicola Low, Jose A Perez-Molina, Javier Zamora
medRxiv 2020.04.16.20066787; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.16.20066787

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (549)
  • Anesthesia (134)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1746)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (310)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (651)
  • Epidemiology (10771)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (582)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2930)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (531)
  • Health Informatics (1917)
  • Health Policy (832)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (741)
  • Hematology (290)
  • HIV/AIDS (627)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12495)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (684)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (319)
  • Neurology (2778)
  • Nursing (150)
  • Nutrition (431)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (553)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (596)
  • Oncology (1452)
  • Ophthalmology (440)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (254)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (378)
  • Pediatrics (863)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (361)
  • Primary Care Research (333)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2626)
  • Public and Global Health (5336)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1001)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (592)
  • Respiratory Medicine (721)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (288)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (124)