Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic

Dennis M. Feehan, Ayesha S. Mahmud
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20064014
Dennis M. Feehan
†Department of Demography, UC Berkeley,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: feehan{at}berkeley.edu feehan{at}berkeley.edu
Ayesha S. Mahmud
‡Department of Demography, UC Berkeley,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mahmuda{at}berkeley.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted primarily through close, person-to-person interactions. In the absence of a vaccine, interventions focused on physical distancing have been widely used to reduce community transmission. These physical distancing policies can only control the spread of SARS-CoV-2 if they are able to reduce the amount of close interpersonal contact in a population. To quantify the impact of these policies over the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, we conducted three waves of contact surveys between March 22 and June 23, 2020. We find that rates of interpersonal contact have been dramatically reduced at all ages in the US, with an 82% (95% CI:80% - 83%) reduction in the average number of daily contacts observed during the first wave compared to pre-pandemic levels. We find that this decline reduced the reproduction number, R0, to below one in March and early April (0.66, 95% CI:0.35 - 0.88). However, with easing of physical distancing measures, we find increases in interpersonal contact rates over the subsequent two waves, pushing R0 above 1. We also find significant differences in numbers of reported contacts by age, gender, race and ethnicity. Certain demographic groups, including people under 45, males, and Black and Hispanic respondents, have significantly higher contact rates than the rest of the population. Tracking changes in interpersonal contact patterns can provide rapid assessments of the impact of physical distancing policies over the course of the pandemic and help identify at-risk populations.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Seed funding was provided by a Berkeley Population Center pilot grant (NICHD P2CHD073964)

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • We have updated the manuscript with more recent data and additional analyses.

  • * For helpful feedback on these results, we thank participants in the April 1, 2020 Berkeley Population Center Brown Bag, C. Jessica E. Metcalf, Caroline Buckee, and Audrey Dorelien. Seed funding was provided by a Berkeley Population Center pilot grant (NICHD P2CHD073964).

Data Availability

Our dashboard has the estimated mixing matrices, and we intend to provide a public-use version of the survey microdata as soon as possible.

https://contact-survey.github.io/dashboard/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 29, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic
Dennis M. Feehan, Ayesha S. Mahmud
medRxiv 2020.04.13.20064014; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20064014
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic
Dennis M. Feehan, Ayesha S. Mahmud
medRxiv 2020.04.13.20064014; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.20064014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3298)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (365)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1173)
  • Epidemiology (13384)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5157)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3274)
  • Health Policy (1143)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1193)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1019)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14636)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (525)
  • Neurology (4930)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (886)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (727)
  • Orthopedics (282)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (544)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4218)
  • Public and Global Health (7512)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1708)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1016)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (549)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)