Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Covid-19 Detection

View ORCID ProfileN Kojima, F Turner, V Slepnev, A Bacelar, L Deming, S Kodeboyina, View ORCID ProfileJD Klausner
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.11.20062372
N Kojima
1Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N Kojima
  • For correspondence: nkojima{at}ucla.edu
F Turner
2Curative Inc., Menlo Park, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V Slepnev
2Curative Inc., Menlo Park, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Bacelar
2Curative Inc., Menlo Park, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Deming
2Curative Inc., Menlo Park, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Kodeboyina
2Curative Inc., Menlo Park, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JD Klausner
1Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 90095
3Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for JD Klausner
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Currently, there is a pandemic caused by the 2019 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes Covid-19. We wanted to compare specimen types and collection methods to explore if a simpler to collect specimen type could expand access to testing.

Methods We recruited individuals recently tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection through a “drive-through” testing program. In participants’ homes, we assessed the performance of self-collected oral fluid swab specimens with and without clinician supervision, clinician-supervised self-collected mid-turbinate (nasal) swab specimens, and clinician-collected nasopharyngeal swab specimens. We tested specimens with a validated reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 and measured cycle threshold values. Symptom status and date of onset of symptoms was also recorded for each participant.

Results We recruited 45 participants. The median age of study participant was 42 years old (Interquartile range, 31 to 52 years). Of the participants, 29 had at least one specimen test positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of those, 21 (73%) of 29 reported active symptoms. By specimen type and home-based collection method, clinician-supervised self-collected oral fluid swab specimens detected 26 (90%) of 29 infected individuals, clinician-supervised self-collected nasal swab specimens detected 23 (85%) of 27, clinician-collected posterior nasopharyngeal swab specimens detected 23 (79%) of 29, and unmonitored self-collected oral fluid swab specimens detected 19 (66%) of 29. Despite nasopharyngeal swabs being considered the gold standard, 4 participants tested negative by clinician-collected nasopharyngeal swab and positive by the 3 other specimen types. Additionally, false negative results by each sample type were seen to generally not overlap.

Conclusions Supervised self-collected oral fluid and nasal swab specimens performed similarly to, if not better than clinician-collected nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. No sample type captured all SARS-CoV-2 infections, suggesting potential heterogeneity in the distribution of viral load in different parts of the respiratory tract between individuals. Supervised self-collection performed comparably to clinician collection and would allow for rapid expansion of testing capacity in the United States by reducing the need for trained healthcare workers, reducing exposure of healthcare workers, and reducing the amount of PPE (personal protective equipment) being used for testing during a critical shortage.

Competing Interest Statement

F.T. and V.S. developed a Covid-19 viral assay for the detection of COVID-19 infection.

Funding Statement

None

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Authors will share data with a reasonable data request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 15, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Covid-19 Detection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Covid-19 Detection
N Kojima, F Turner, V Slepnev, A Bacelar, L Deming, S Kodeboyina, JD Klausner
medRxiv 2020.04.11.20062372; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.11.20062372
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Covid-19 Detection
N Kojima, F Turner, V Slepnev, A Bacelar, L Deming, S Kodeboyina, JD Klausner
medRxiv 2020.04.11.20062372; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.11.20062372

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (434)
  • Allergy and Immunology (760)
  • Anesthesia (222)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3316)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (366)
  • Dermatology (282)
  • Emergency Medicine (480)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1175)
  • Epidemiology (13403)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (900)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5182)
  • Geriatric Medicine (483)
  • Health Economics (786)
  • Health Informatics (3286)
  • Health Policy (1146)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1199)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1024)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14657)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (917)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (128)
  • Nephrology (526)
  • Neurology (4957)
  • Nursing (263)
  • Nutrition (735)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (889)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (797)
  • Oncology (2531)
  • Ophthalmology (730)
  • Orthopedics (284)
  • Otolaryngology (348)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (547)
  • Pediatrics (1308)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (552)
  • Primary Care Research (559)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4225)
  • Public and Global Health (7526)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1717)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1022)
  • Respiratory Medicine (982)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (500)
  • Sports Medicine (425)
  • Surgery (551)
  • Toxicology (73)
  • Transplantation (237)
  • Urology (206)