ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE Explore the perceptions and experiences of the UK public of social distancing and social isolation measures related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
DESIGN Qualitative study comprising five focus groups carried out online during the early stages of the UK’s social distancing and isolation measures (5-12 days post lockdown).
SETTING Online video-conferencing
PARTICIPANTS 27 participants, all UK residents aged 18 years and older, representing a range of gender, ethnic, age and occupational backgrounds.
RESULTS The social distancing and isolation associated with COVID-19 policy has had having substantial negative impacts on the mental health and wellbeing of the UK public within a short time of policy implementation. It has disproportionately negatively affected those in low-paid or precarious employment. Practical social and economic losses - the loss of (in-person) social interaction, loss of income and loss of structure and routine – led to psychological and emotional ‘losses’ – the loss of motivation, loss of meaning, and loss of self-worth. Participants reported high adherence to distancing and isolation guidelines but reported seeing or hearing of non-adherence in others. A central concern for participants was the uncertainty duration of the measures, and their ability to cope longer-term. Some participants felt they would have lingering concerns over social contact while others were eager to return to high levels of social activity.
CONCLUSIONS A rapid response is necessary in terms of public health programming to mitigate the mental health impacts of COVID-19 social distancing and isolation. Initial high levels of support for, and adherence to, social distancing and isolation is likely to wane over time, particularly where end dates are uncertain. Social distancing and isolation ‘exit strategies’ must account for the fact that, although some individuals will voluntarily or habitually continue to socially distance, others will seek high levels of social engagement as soon as possible.
What is already known on this topic
Adherence to non-pharmaceutical interventions during pandemics is lower where people have low trust in government and where people perceive themselves at relatively low risk from the disease
There is a need for evidence on public perceptions and experiences of the psychological and social public experiences of COVID-19 related social distancing and isolation, and its relation to adherence.
What this study adds
People lack trust in government and perceive themselves at low personal risk,but closely adhere to social distancing and isolation measures motivated by social conscience, and are critical of non-adherence in others.
Population-wide social distancing and isolation can have significant negative social and psychological impacts within a short time of policy implementation.
Key concerns during social distancing and isolation are uncertainty of duration and ability to cope longer-term.
At the end of pandemic ‘lockdowns’, some individuals will likely voluntarily or habitually continue to socially distance, while others will likely seek high levels of social engagement as soon as possible.
Competing Interest Statement
Armitage is supported by NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre. Tampe is an independent consultant and currently consults for the World Health Organization. The authors have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Manchester Centre for Health Psychology based at the University of Manchester (£2000). Armitage's contribution was additionally supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre. The funders played no role in the conduct of the study.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
s.n.williams{at}swansea.ac.uk, chris.armitage{at}manchester.ac.uk, tova.tampe{at}gmail.com, kimberly.dienes{at}manchester.ac.uk
Data Availability
Ethical restrictions related to participant confidentiality prohibit the authors from making the data set publicly available. During the consent process, participants were explicitly guaranteed that the data would only be seen my members of the study team. For any discussions about the data set please contact the corresponding author, Simon Williams (s.n.william@swansea.ac.uk).
