Abstract
Introduction Disadvantaged socioeconomic position (SEP) in early and adult life has been repeatedly associated with premature mortality. However, it is unclear whether these inequalities differ across time, nor if they are consistent across different SEP indicators.
Methods British birth cohorts born in 1946, 1958 and 1970 were used, and multiple SEP indicators in early and adult life were examined. Deaths were identified via national statistics or notifications. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate associations between SEP indicators and mortality risk—from 26-43 (n=40,784), 26-58 (n=35,431), and 26-70 years (n=5,353).
Results More disadvantaged SEP was associated with higher mortality risk—magnitudes of association were similar across cohort and each SEP indicator. For example, hazards ratios (95% CI) between 26-43 years comparing lowest to highest father’s social class were 2.74 (1.02—7.32) in 1946c, 1.66 (1.03—2.69) in 1958c, and 1.94 (1.20—3.15) in 1970c. Childhood social class, adult social class, and housing tenure were each independently associated with mortality risk.
Conclusions Socioeconomic circumstances in early and adult life appear to have had persisting associations with premature mortality from 1971—2016. This reaffirms the need to address socioeconomic factors across life to reduce inequalities in survival to older age.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
DB is supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number ES/M001660/1) and MF and DB by The Academy of Medical Sciences / Wellcome Trust (“Springboard Health of the Public in 2040” award: HOP001/1025). RH is Director of CLOSER which is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (award reference: ES/K000357/1). GBP is Director of Research of CLS which is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (award reference: ES/M001660/1).The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
NSHD data are freely accessible to bona fide researchers by applying through the NSHD data sharing website (https://skylark.ucl.ac.uk/NSHD/doku.php). NCDS and BCS data are freely accessible to bona fide researchers by applying through the UK Data Service (https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/).