Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Explaining the “Bomb-Like” Dynamics of COVID-19 with Modeling and the Implications for Policy

View ORCID ProfileGary Lin, Alexandra T. Strauss, Maxwell Pinz, View ORCID ProfileDiego A. Martinez, Katie K. Tseng, Emily Schueller, Oliver Gatalo, Yupeng Yang, Simon A. Levin, Eili Y. Klein, For the CDC MInD-Healthcare Program
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.05.20054338
Gary Lin
1School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
2Center for Data Science in Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gary Lin
Alexandra T. Strauss
1School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
2Center for Data Science in Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
MD, MIE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maxwell Pinz
3Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diego A. Martinez
1School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
2Center for Data Science in Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
4Department of Operations Integration, Johns Hopkins Health System, Baltimore, MD
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Diego A. Martinez
Katie K. Tseng
5Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics, and Policy, Washington, DC
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Schueller
5Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics, and Policy, Washington, DC
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver Gatalo
5Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics, and Policy, Washington, DC
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yupeng Yang
5Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics, and Policy, Washington, DC
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon A. Levin
6Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
7Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eili Y. Klein
1School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
2Center for Data Science in Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
5Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics, and Policy, Washington, DC
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: eklein{at}jhu.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Using a Bayesian approach to epidemiological compartmental modeling, we demonstrate the “bomb-like” behavior of exponential growth in COVID-19 cases can be explained by transmission of asymptomatic and mild cases that are typically unreported at the beginning of pandemic events due to lower prevalence of testing. We studied the exponential phase of the pandemic in Italy, Spain, and South Korea, and found the R0 to be 2.56 (95% CrI, 2.41-2.71), 3.23 (95% CrI, 3.06-3.4), and 2.36 (95% CrI, 2.22-2.5) if we use Bayesian priors that assume a large portion of cases are not detected. Weaker priors regarding the detection rate resulted in R0 values of 9.22 (95% CrI, 9.01-9.43), 9.14 (95% CrI, 8.99-9.29), and 8.06 (95% CrI, 7.82-8.3) and assumes nearly 90% of infected patients are identified. Given the mounting evidence that potentially large fractions of the population are asymptomatic, the weaker priors that generate the high R0 values to fit the data required assumptions about the epidemiology of COVID-19 that do not fit with the biology, particularly regarding the timeframe that people remain infectious. Our results suggest that models of transmission assuming a relatively lower R0 value that do not consider a large number of asymptomatic cases can result in misunderstanding of the underlying dynamics, leading to poor policy decisions and outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MInD-Healthcare Program (Grant Number 1U01CK000536). SL was supported by The National Science Foundation (CCF 1917819). DM was also supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Learning Laboratory program.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data derived from public domain resources

https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 07, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Explaining the “Bomb-Like” Dynamics of COVID-19 with Modeling and the Implications for Policy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Explaining the “Bomb-Like” Dynamics of COVID-19 with Modeling and the Implications for Policy
Gary Lin, Alexandra T. Strauss, Maxwell Pinz, Diego A. Martinez, Katie K. Tseng, Emily Schueller, Oliver Gatalo, Yupeng Yang, Simon A. Levin, Eili Y. Klein, For the CDC MInD-Healthcare Program
medRxiv 2020.04.05.20054338; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.05.20054338
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Explaining the “Bomb-Like” Dynamics of COVID-19 with Modeling and the Implications for Policy
Gary Lin, Alexandra T. Strauss, Maxwell Pinz, Diego A. Martinez, Katie K. Tseng, Emily Schueller, Oliver Gatalo, Yupeng Yang, Simon A. Levin, Eili Y. Klein, For the CDC MInD-Healthcare Program
medRxiv 2020.04.05.20054338; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.05.20054338

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (427)
  • Allergy and Immunology (753)
  • Anesthesia (220)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3284)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (362)
  • Dermatology (275)
  • Emergency Medicine (478)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1166)
  • Epidemiology (13346)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (898)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5137)
  • Geriatric Medicine (480)
  • Health Economics (781)
  • Health Informatics (3260)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (428)
  • HIV/AIDS (1015)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14615)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (910)
  • Medical Education (476)
  • Medical Ethics (126)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4907)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (725)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (880)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2517)
  • Ophthalmology (722)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (540)
  • Pediatrics (1299)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (548)
  • Primary Care Research (555)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4196)
  • Public and Global Health (7489)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1703)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1010)
  • Respiratory Medicine (979)
  • Rheumatology (479)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (495)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (547)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (203)