Abstract
Introduction Residual disease in ‘normal appearing’ peritoneum is seen in nearly 30% following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Our goal was to study prospectively, the sequence of response in different regions, the commonest sites of occult residual disease, its incidence in different peritoneal regions and the potential therapeutic implications of these.
Methods The patterns of response were studied based on the finding of residual disease in cytoreductive surgery specimens on pathological evaluation. A protocol for pathological evaluation was laid down and followed. Informed consent was taken from all patients. A correlation between clinical and pathological findings was made. Sugarbaker’s peritoneal cancer index was used to describe the regional distribution of peritoneal disease
Results In 85 patients treated between July 2018 to June 2019, 83 FIGO stage III-C at diagnosis and 2 stage IV-A. Microscopic disease in ‘normal appearing’ peritoneal regions was seen in 22 (25.2%) and in normal peritoneum around tumor nodules in 30 (35.2%). Regions 4 and 8 of Sugarbaker’s peritoneal cancer index had the highest incidence of residual disease in absence of visible disease and regions 9 and 10 the lowest. The response to chemotherapy occurred in a similar manner in over 95% of the patients-the least common site of residual disease was the small bowel mesentery, followed by upper regions (regions 1-3), omentum and middle regions (regions 0, 4, 8), lower regions (regions 5-7) and lastly the ovaries. Nearly 85% had 4 or more peritonectomies and 67% had 6-7 peritonecomies.
Conclusions Complete resection of involved the peritoneal region could address all the occult disease in a particular region. The role of resection of the entire region as well as ‘normal appearing’ parietal peritoneal regions (or total parietal peritonectomy) during interval cytoreduction should be prospectively evaluated to determine its impact on morbidity and survival.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no funding for the study
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available on reasonable request
