Abstract
Objectives The rapidly evolving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. It was first detected in the city of Wuhan in China and has spread globally resulting in substantial health and economic crisis in many countries. Observational studies have partially identified the different aspects of this disease. Up to this date, no comprehensive systematic review for the clinical, laboratory, epidemiologic and mortality findings has been published. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis for a better understanding of COVID-19.
Methods We reviewed the scientific literature published from January 1, 2019 to March 3, 2020. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA (version 14, IC; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The pooled frequency with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was assessed using random effect model. Publication bias was assessed and p <0.05 was considered a statistically significant publication bias.
Results Out of 1102 studies, 32 satisfied the inclusion criteria. A total of 4789 patients with a mean age of 49 years were evaluated. Fever (83.0%, CI 77.5 to 87.6), cough (65.2%, CI 58.6 to 71.2) and myalgia/fatigue (34.7, CI 26.0 to 44.4) were the most common symptoms. The most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (18.5 %, CI 12.7 to 24.4) and Cardiovascular disease (14.9 %, CI 6.0 to 23.8). Among the laboratory abnormalities, elevated C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (72.0% (CI 54.3 to 84.6) and lymphopenia (50.1%, CI 38.0 to 62.4) were the most common findings. Bilateral ground-glass opacities (66.0%, CI 51.1 to 78.0) was the most common CT-Scan presentation. Pooled mortality rate was 6.6%, with males having significantly higher mortality compared to females (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 9.1, P = 0.01).
Conclusion COVID-19 commonly presented with a progressive course of cough and fever with more than half of hospitalized patients showing leukopenia or a high CRP on their laboratory findings. Mortality associated with COVID19 was higher than that reported in studies in China with Males having a 3-fold higher risk of mortality in COVID19 compared to females.
What is already known in this topic
COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020.
Many observational studies have separately dealt with different clinical and epidemiologic features of this new and rapidly evolving disease.
Very few systematic reviews about COVID-19 have been done and there was still a need for a systematic review and meta-analysis related to the clinical findings and the mortality of the disease in order to have a better understanding of COVID-19.
Previous reports have indicated that older age and presence of multiple comorbidities are associated with increased mortality.
What this study adds
The mortality rate in our study for hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 6.6% and males had around 3-fold higher risk of mortality compared to females (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.2-9.1, P = 0.01).
These findings could indicate the need for more aggressive treatment of COVID-19 in males.
Introduction
Facing an immediate crisis by the novel coronavirus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, (SARS-CoV-2), which has been called the once in a century pathogen requires a global response to this outbreak(1). The disease caused by this virus has been named “coronavirus disease 2019” (COVID-19) by the World Health Organization. As of now, more than 168 countries have reported COVID19 patients. Given the increasing number of countries infected with SARS-CoV-2, WHO declared COVID19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020.(2) The SARS-CoV-2 virus is a betacoronavirus and like the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome virus (MERS-CoV) and SARS-CoV that caused the previous respiratory syndrome outbreaks, belongs to the family of coronaviruses. However, this is the first pandemic caused by a member of the coronavirus family (3).
COVID19 started in China in December 2019 when a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause was identified in the city of Wuhan. Since then, it has infected hundreds of thousands of people around the world and resulted in more than 13000 deaths up to this date (4). Despite governmental travel restrictions in many countries, the confirmed number of new cases has been rising globally. The international community has asked for at least US$675 million for preparedness and protection of states with weaker health systems (5).
In the previous two outbreaks of coronaviral respiratory illness, namely Severe Acute Respiratory Illness (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Illness (MERS), gender-based difference in mortality was observed. In SARS, younger males were at twice the risk of death compared to females and the difference in mortality reduced with older age(6). The case fatality rate observed in males was twice that of females in MERS (7). The effect of sex on COVID-19 mortality was unknown. We evaluated this risk for COVID-19 patients as well.
The novelty of COVID19 has raised many questions about the epidemiology of the disease, clinical and laboratory methods of diagnosis as well as therapeutic measures. Thus far, many observational studies have been dealing with these features separately, however, there is still a necessity for more systematic reviews specially to understand role of the sex in mortality of COVID19. In this meta-analysis study, we reviewed the published literature from January 1, 2019 to March 3, 2020 to provide an overview for a better understanding of COVID-19.
Methods
Search strategy
We searched Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 1, 2019 to March 3, 2020. The search strategy was based on the following key-words: COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, nCoV disease, SARS2, COVID19, Wuhan coronavirus, Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus, 2019-nCoV, coronavirus disease-19, coronavirus disease 2019, 2019 novel coronavirus and Wuhan pneumonia. Lists of references of selected articles and relevant review articles were hand-searched to identify further studies. This study was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines (8). The study did not require any ethics committee approval. This research was done without patient involvement. Patients were not invited to comment on the study design and were not consulted to develop patient relevant outcomes or interpret the results. Patients were not invited to contribute to the writing or editing of this document for readability or accuracy.
Study Selection
The records found through database searching were merged and the duplicates were removed using EndNote X7 (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA). Two reviewers (YF and PJ) independently screened the records by title and abstract to exclude those not related to the current study. The full texts of potentially eligible records were retrieved and evaluated by a third reviewer (AT). Included studies met the following inclusion criteria: (i) patients were confirmed and diagnosed with RT-PCR as suggested by WHO; (ii) The raw data for clinical, radiological and laboratory findings were included; and (iii) the outcomes were addressed. Studies with insufficient information about patients’ characteristics and outcomes were excluded. Case reports, reviews, and animal studies were also excluded. Only studies written in English were selected.
Data extraction and quality assessment
A data extraction form was designed by two reviewers (AZ and SH). These reviewers extracted the data from all eligible studies and differences were resolved by consensus. The following data were extracted: first author name; year of publication; type of study, country/ies where the study was conducted; distribution of age and sex in the population, number of patients investigated, data for clinical, radiological and laboratory findings, and outcomes.
Data Synthesis and Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with STATA (version 14, IC; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The pooled frequency with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was assessed using random effect model. The between-study heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran’s Q and the I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed statistically by using Begg’s and Egger’s tests (p<0.05 was considered indicative of statistically significant publication bias).
Quality assessment
The checklist provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) was used to perform quality assessment(9).
Results
The search yielded 1102 publications, of which 259 potentially eligible studies were identified for full-text review, resulting in 32 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria (Figure 1) (Table1). The mean age of the patients was 49.0 years and 4789 patients were included. Based on JBI tool, the included studies had a low risk of bias.
Clinical manifestations
The most common signs and symptoms were fever (83.0%, CI 77.5-87.6), cough (65.2%, CI 58.6-71.2), dyspnea (27.4%, CI 19.6-35.2), myalgia/fatigue (34.7, CI 26.0-44.4) followed by hemoptysis (2.4%, CI 0.8-6.7), diarrhea (5.7%, CI 3.8-8.6) and nausea/vomiting (5.0 %, CI 2.3-10.7). Sputum production (17.2%, CI 10.8-26.4) was a relatively common symptom. (Table 2).
Comorbidities
The most common comorbidities were respectively hypertension (18.5 %, CI 12.7-24.4), cardiovascular diseases (14.9 %, CI 6.0-23.8), diabetes (10.8 %, CI 8.3-13.3), chronic liver disease (8.1, CI 4.6-11.6) and smoking (8.0%, CI 2.3-13.6) (Table 3).
Laboratory findings
The most frequent abnormal laboratory findings in patients with COVID-19 were respectively, increased C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (72% CI 54.3-84.6), lymphopenia (50.1%, CI 38.0-62.4), high levels of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) (41%,CI 22.8-62.0), increased serum aspartate aminotransferase (19.7%, CI 10.5-33.7) and thrombocytopenia (11.1%, CI 7.7-15.7) (Table 4). Among the confirmed COVID19 subjects, 14.0% (CI, 6.7-29.0) had viremia. Impaired hepatic function with ALT levels greater than 47.25 U/L was seen in 13.3% (CI 3.2-41.0) of COVID19 subjects. Acute cardiac injury with troponin levels greater than 28 pg/ml was seen in 12.4% of the patients. Acute kidney injury was found in 5.5% (CI 1.3-20.8). Shock was reported in 4.0% (CI 1.6-12.0) shock. 13.0% (CI 4.8-30.0) met the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Radiologic findings
Chest X-Ray (CXR) and chest CT-scan were the common imaging modalities used for the diagnosis of COVID19. The pooled sensitivity for CT-scan for COVID19 was 79.3%. The most common sites of the lung involvement based on chest CT-scan were right lower lobe (76.2, CI 57.8-82.5) followed by left lower lobe (71.8%, CI 57.8-82.5). Most of the patients (74.8%) had bilateral involvement. The most common pattern of parenchymal involvement was ground-glass opacity (66.0%, CI 51.1-78.0). The chest CT-scan was reported normal in 20.7% of the patients with confirmed RT-PCR results (Table 5).
Outcomes
Hospitalization was required in 94.6% of patients with severe COVID-19. The pooled mortality rate of these patients was about 6.6% (CI 2.8-15.0) (Table 6, 7). Old age, male sex, presence of underlying diseases, higher level of D-dimer, lower level of fibrinogen and anti-thrombin, progressive radiographic deterioration in follow up CT-scans, developed ARDS and requirement of mechanical ventilation were reported factors associated with increased mortality rate. As shown in Table 8, men had significantly higher mortality in the hospital compared to women (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.2-9.1, P = 0.01). Although ICU admission was higher in men, the difference was not significant. The mean duration between the time of hospitalization and death was 17.5 days with minimum and maximum periods of 14 and 21 days respectively. The effects and summaries calculated using a random-effects model weighted by the study population is shown in Figure 2.
The pooled mortality rate of patients with COVID-19. Effects and summaries were calculated using a random-effects model weighted by study population.
Discussion
We evaluated the signs and symptoms, diagnostic modalities, therapeutic measures and epidemiologic features of COVID-19 to have a better understanding of this pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. In terms of clinical manifestations, the most common signs and symptoms were fever and cough. Hypertension and cardiovascular diseases were the most common comorbidities among patients. Between the different abnormal laboratory findings, increased levels of CRP and lymphopenia were the most common findings. Chest X-Ray and chest CT-scan were the most common imaging modalities used for the diagnosis. The pooled sensitivity of CT-san for COVID19 was 79.3%. We found 20.7% of the patients with confirmed RT-PCR who had normal chest CT-Scan suggesting that a normal chest CT-scan cannot rule out the disease in patients who are highly suspicious for COVID-19. Several complications were seen due to COVID-19. Among these, acute hepatitis was the most common one occurring in 13.3% of cases, followed by cardiac injury with troponin levels greater than 28 pg/ml seen in 12.4%. The pooled mortality rate of these patients was 6.6%. We detected several factors contributing to a worse outcome including old age, male sex, presence of underlying diseases and some abnormal laboratory finding such as high level of D-Dimer. Although there was not any significant difference between male and female gender in ICU admissions, male gender showed a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate.
The current study showed that fever (83.0%), cough (65.2%) and dyspnea (27.4%) were the most common signs and symptoms. In a study done by Zhang et al in Wuhan, fever was identified as the most common clinical finding present in 91.7% of the patients followed by cough in 75% of patients. Their study showed a higher gastrointestinal (GI) manifestation at presentation of the disease, representing 39.6% of the patients (10). Our study showed a lower prevalence of GI symptoms including diarrhea, which was present in 5.7% of patients and nausea/vomiting in 5%.
The most prevalent comorbidities in our study were hypertension (18.5 %, CI 12.7-24.4) followed by cardiovascular diseases (14.9 %, CI 6.0-23.8) and diabetes (10.8 %, CI 8.3-13.3). According to a systematic review for comorbidities by Yang et al, hypertension (17 ± 7%, CI 14-22%) and diabetes (8 ± 6%, CI 6-11%), followed by cardiovascular diseases (5 ± 4%, CI 4-7%) were the most common comorbid findings (11). The high prevalence of hypertension and other cardiovascular comorbidities have raised speculation regarding the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI) in COVID-19. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor has been identified as the receptor used by SARS-CoV-2 to infect human cells and previous studies have shown that the usage of ACEI results in the upregulation of ACE2 (12) (13). Theoretically, this increase in ACE2 levels could result in a greater risk of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Current evidence against the use of ACEI in patients with COVID-19 or those at risk of the disease is limited, and further studies are needed to analyze this possible association.
The most common laboratory abnormalities were elevated C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (72%), lymphopenia (50.1%) and elevated LDH (41%). Also, thrombocytopenia was seen in 11.1% of the subjects. Analyses by Huang et al and Lippi et al have suggested that lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia in COVID-19 patients are associated with poorer outcomes, respectively (14, 15). Interestingly, patients with SARS were reported to have a higher percentage of lymphopenia (68-90%) and thrombocytopenia (20-45%) compared to COVID-19 patients (16). A similar reduction in counts was also observed in patients with H1N1 influenza (17). Thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia have been previously shown to strongly indicate a higher risk of mortality in SARS and influenza (17, 18). Given the current lack of predictive biomarkers in COVID-19, lymphocyte and platelet count may be used as indicators of severe disease in the clinical setting.
Liver abnormality was the most common complication and was present among 13.3% of the subjects, although the data was reported only in 3 studies. However, a significant number of subjects had elevated AST (19.7%) and ALT (14.6%). Impaired liver function has been observed as collateral damage in some viral infections including SARS, possibly caused by direct damage to the hepatic tissue by the pathogen (19). While this could be the case with COVID19, an iatrogenic effect due to medications like lopinavir cannot be ruled out.
Another significant finding in our analysis was the incidence of cardiac injury in 12.4% of the patients, which is a common event seen in a multitude of viral illnesses(20). Gao et al observed that subjects with influenza (H7N9) and cardiac injury had an elevated risk of mortality (HR=2.06) (21). In a study by Ludwig et al for analysis of cardiac biomarkers in influenza patients, 24% of the subjects showed ACI in ≤30 days after influenza diagnosis and half of them were myocardial infarction (22). Although our analysis did not show increased mortality risk in patients with cardiac injury, these findings could indicate the potential need for identifying and optimizing cardiac risk factors in COVID-19 patients during the treatment period.
The mean duration between hospitalization and death was 17.5 days (range-14-21 days), compared to 17.4 days in SARS (23). The overall mortality rate in this study was 6.6%, which is more than twice than previously reported (24). Though comparable mortality was reported by Li et al (7%) and Qian et al (8.9%) in their meta-analyses, a study by Rodriguez et al showed a much higher death rate of 13.9% (25-27). On the other hand, a study from the Jiangsu province of China results showed a high cure rate equal to 96.67%. Although the main reason for very low mortality on this study remains unknown, measures including early recognition and centered-quarantine may be contributing factors(28).
Of note, the in-hospital mortality of males was significantly higher than females (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.2-9.1, P = 0.01). A similar pattern of higher mortality in males has been reported in previous coronavirus outbreaks of SARS and MERS. Karlberg et al also reported that the gender-based difference in mortality was higher in younger males (0-44 years) (RR=2), compared to those of age group 45-74 (RR-1.45) (6). Similarly, the study by Alghamdi et al showed that the case fatality rate in males was twice that of females in MERS (52% VS 23%) (29). Although a gender-based difference in the immune response to infections has been suggested as a possible factor, other contributing factors including smoking history and severity of underlying comorbidities cannot be ruled out (30). This is especially of significance in China, where the prevalence of smoking among men (57.6%) is almost 10 times higher than in women (6.7%) (31). This difference in mortality opens the discussion for the need to treat COVID19 more aggressively in males, including the possibility of earlier intubation and mechanical ventilation in this population. Further investigations are also needed to understand this phenomenon.
This study has several limitations. Due to the rapidly emerging COVID-19 situation around the globe and the novelty of this coronavirus, there is still limited clinical data regarding diagnostic modalities and effective therapeutic measures. Most of the clinical findings were from observational studies. Future clinical trials and animal models are also required to have conclusive clinical information. We also need more studies outside of China for a comprehensive result that reflects COVID-19 globally. In the end, due to the lack of accurate reports of the new cases in different countries, the epidemiologic measures are also limited. As this pandemic is growing fast, future studies are needed for the evaluation of epidemiologic and clinical features of COVID-19.
Conclusion
COVID-19 presents with a significant number of mortalities especially among males around the world. The pooled mortality rate in our study was 6.6%. The high rate of hospitalization and case fatality among hospitalized patients along with the lack of intensive care facilities necessitated the identification of factors associated with the severe disease and mortality. These factors included male gender, age, underlying diseases, higher level of D-Dimer, lower level of fibrinogen and anti-thrombin, progressive radiographic deterioration on follow up, developed ARDS and requirement of mechanical ventilation. It was inferred that higher comorbidities such as hypertension and cardiovascular diseases could be related to the pathogenesis of the virus through ACE II receptor. This association could open doors for future studies to evaluate the role of ACE inhibitor drugs in the high-risk group. There are still a lot of unknown features of COVID-19 for the broad scientific community to investigate in an effort to slow the progression and mortality of COVID-19 and finally defeat this pandemic.
Data Availability
Authors can confirm that all relevant data are included in the article and/or its supplementary information files
Footnotes
↵* Should be consider as first authors.
mj.nasiri{at}hotmail.com
sxh1241{at}miami.edu
m.sina.h.2015{at}gmail.com
Yeganehfarsi{at}yahoo.com
arbabimahta24{at}gmail.com
hasanzadehsaba{at}yahoo.com
parnian.jamshidi7{at}gmail.com
mxm193278{at}miami.edu
Msm249{at}med.miami.edu
Acquisition of data: Azin Tahvildari, Yeganeh Farsi, Mahta Arbabi, Saba Hasanzadeh, Parnian Jamshidi, Mohammad Nasiri
Analysis and/or interpretation of data: Mohammad Nasiri, Mehdi Mirsaeidi
Drafting and revision of manuscript: Sara Haddadi, Mukunthan Murthi, Mohamad Nasiri, Mehdi Mirsaeidi
Copyright/license for publication: “The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide licence to the Publishers and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known now or created in the future), to i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Contribution, ii) translate the Contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or, abstracts of the Contribution, iii) create any other derivative work(s) based on the Contribution, iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the Contribution, v) the inclusion of electronic links from the Contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located; and, vi) licence any third party to do any or all of the above.”
Conflicts of interests: The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Transparency statement: The lead author affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as originally planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.
Financial statement: The author(s) received no specific funding for this study.
Dissemination declaration: Dissemination to results to the study participants and or patient organisations is not possible/applicable.
References
