Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of public health measures to control COVID-19: a modelling study

Qiang Wang, Naiyang Shi, Jinxin Huang, Tingting Cui, Liuqing Yang, Jing Ai, Hong Ji, Ke Xu, Tauseef Ahmad, Changjun Bao, Hui Jin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.20.20039644
Qiang Wang
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
2Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naiyang Shi
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
2Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinxin Huang
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
2Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tingting Cui
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
2Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liuqing Yang
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
2Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing Ai
3Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Ji
3Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ke Xu
3Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tauseef Ahmad
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Changjun Bao
3Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui Jin
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
2Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing (210009), China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jinhui_hld@163.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in China, which caused a respiratory disease known as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since its discovery, the virus has spread to over 160 countries and claimed more than 9800 deaths. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of various response public health measures.

Methods The stochastic agent-based model was used to simulate the process of COVID-19 outbreak in scenario I (imported one case) and II (imported four cases) with a series of public health measures, involving the personal protection, isolation-and-quarantine, gathering restriction, and community containment. The virtual community was constructed following the susceptible-latent-infectious-recovered framework. The epidemiological and economic parameters derived from the previous literature and field investigation. The main outcomes included avoided infectors, cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess uncertainty.

Results In scenario I and II, the isolation-and-quarantine averted 1696 and 1990 humans infected respectively at the cost of US$12 428 and US$58 555, both with negative value of ICERs. The joint strategy of personal protection and isolation-and-quarantine could avert one more case than single isolation-and-quarantine with additional cost of US$166 871 and US$180 140 respectively. The effectiveness of isolation-and-quarantine decreased as lowering quarantine probability and increasing delay-time. Especially in scenario II, when the quarantine probability was less than 25%, the number of infections raised sharply; when the quarantine delay-time reached six days, more than a quarter of individuals would be infected in the community. The strategy including community containment could protect more lives and was cost-effective, when the number of imported cases was no less than 65, or the delay-time of quarantine was more than five days, or the quarantine probability was below 25%, based on current assumptions.

Conclusions The isolation-and-quarantine was the most cost-effective intervention. However, personal protection and isolation-and-quarantine was the optimal strategy averting more infectors than single isolation-and-quarantine. Certain restrictions should be considered, such as more initial imported cases, longer quarantine delay-time and lower quarantine probability.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Chinese National Natural Fund (81573258); Jiangsu Provincial Major Science & Technology Demonstration Project (BE2015714, BE2017749); Jiangsu Provincial Six Talent Peak (WSN-002); and Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Discipline (ZDXKA2016008).The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data derived from previous study and they were available.

  • Abbreviations

    COVID-19
    coronavirus disease 2019
    SARS
    Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
    MERS
    Middle East Respiratory Syndrome
    NPIs
    nonpharmaceutical interventions
    ABM
    agent-based model
    SLIR
    susceptible-latent-infectious-recovered
    OR
    odds ratio
    RR
    relative risk
    CDC
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention
    GDP
    Gross Domestic Product
    PCDI
    per capita disposable income
    CERs
    cost-effectiveness ratios
    ICERs
    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
    SD
    standard deviation
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted March 27, 2020.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of public health measures to control COVID-19: a modelling study
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of public health measures to control COVID-19: a modelling study
    Qiang Wang, Naiyang Shi, Jinxin Huang, Tingting Cui, Liuqing Yang, Jing Ai, Hong Ji, Ke Xu, Tauseef Ahmad, Changjun Bao, Hui Jin
    medRxiv 2020.03.20.20039644; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.20.20039644
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of public health measures to control COVID-19: a modelling study
    Qiang Wang, Naiyang Shi, Jinxin Huang, Tingting Cui, Liuqing Yang, Jing Ai, Hong Ji, Ke Xu, Tauseef Ahmad, Changjun Bao, Hui Jin
    medRxiv 2020.03.20.20039644; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.20.20039644

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Epidemiology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (174)
    • Allergy and Immunology (421)
    • Anesthesia (97)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (901)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (170)
    • Dermatology (102)
    • Emergency Medicine (257)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (407)
    • Epidemiology (8790)
    • Forensic Medicine (4)
    • Gastroenterology (405)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1864)
    • Geriatric Medicine (179)
    • Health Economics (388)
    • Health Informatics (1292)
    • Health Policy (644)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (492)
    • Hematology (207)
    • HIV/AIDS (395)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10567)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
    • Medical Education (193)
    • Medical Ethics (52)
    • Nephrology (218)
    • Neurology (1756)
    • Nursing (103)
    • Nutrition (266)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (343)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (461)
    • Oncology (965)
    • Ophthalmology (283)
    • Orthopedics (107)
    • Otolaryngology (177)
    • Pain Medicine (118)
    • Palliative Medicine (43)
    • Pathology (264)
    • Pediatrics (557)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (266)
    • Primary Care Research (219)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1845)
    • Public and Global Health (3986)
    • Radiology and Imaging (655)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (344)
    • Respiratory Medicine (535)
    • Rheumatology (215)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
    • Sports Medicine (166)
    • Surgery (197)
    • Toxicology (37)
    • Transplantation (106)
    • Urology (80)