Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Estimating the reproduction number of COVID-19 in Iran using epidemic modeling

View ORCID ProfileEbrahim Sahafizadeh, Samaneh Sartoli
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.20.20038422
Ebrahim Sahafizadeh
1Department of Information Technology, Payame Noor University, P, O, Box 19395-3697 Tehran, IRAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ebrahim Sahafizadeh
  • For correspondence: sahafizadeh{at}gmail.com
Samaneh Sartoli
1Department of Information Technology, Payame Noor University, P, O, Box 19395-3697 Tehran, IRAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background As reported by Iranian governments, the first cases of coronavirus (COVID-19) infections confirmed in Qom, Iran on February 19, 2020 (30 Bahman 1398). The number of identified cases afterward increased rapidly and the novel coronavirus spread to all provinces of the country. This study aimed to fit an epidemic model to the reported cases data to estimate the basic reproduction number (R0) of COVID-19 in Iran.

Methods We used data from February 21, 2020, to April 21, 2020, on the number of cases reported by Iranian governments and we employed the SIR (Susceptible-Infectious-Removed) epidemic spreading model to fit the transmission model to the reported cases data by tuning the parameters in order to estimate the basic reproduction number of COVID-19 in Iran.

Results The value of reproduction number was estimated 4.86 in the first week and 4.5 in the second week. it decreased from 4.29 to 2.37 in the next four weeks. At the seventh week of the outbreak the reproduction number was reduced below one.

Conclusions The results indicate that the basic reproduction number of COVID-19 was significantly larger than one in the early stages of the outbreak. However, implementing social distancing and preventing travelling on Nowruz (Persian New Year) effectively reduced the reproduction number. Although the results indicate that reproduction number is below one, it is necessary to continue social distancing and control travelling to prevent causing a second wave of outbreak.

Background

On December 31, 2019, the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, China [1] and the potential of transmitting virus via human travelling caused to spread the novel corona virus to other Chinese provinces as well as the other countries [2].

Iranian governments reported the first confirmed cases of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Qom, on February 19, 2020 (30 Bahman 1398) [3].

Tehran, Guilan and Markazi were the other provinces confirmed to be infected by coronavirus during the next days of the outbreak. After one week Iranian governments confirmed that 18 out of 31 provinces of Iran were infected by the novel coronavirus. After two weeks the number of reported cases increased to 2922 people of whom 92 cases died and 552 cases recovered [3].

The aim of this study is to estimate basic reproduction number (R0) of COVID-19 in Iran. For this purpose, we use the reported data by Iranian governments and develop an epidemic model to fit on the real data by tuning the model parameters. We then use the model parameters’ values to calculate the basic reproduction number of COVID-19 in Iran.

Methods

We employ the SIR (Susceptible-Infected-Removed) epidemic model to represent the spreading process of COVID-19 in Iran. SIR model is an epidemic spreading model proposed by Kermack and McKendric [4]. We estimate the parameters of model to get a best fit on reported data of COVID-19 outbreak in Iran. The differential equations of the SIR model are given as [5]: Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image

Where S(t), I(t) and R(t) are the number of susceptible, infected and removed people. We assume that removed cases are the summation of recovered and dead cases. β is the infection rate, and γ is the remove rate which is the inverse of infectious period.

The basic reproduction number, R0, is the average number of the secondary individuals in a complete susceptible population infected by a single infected person during its spreading life [6]. When R0 > 1 virus spreads through the population and when R0 < 1 the outbreak will stop due to decreasing the number of new cases. According to Eq. (2) when the number of infected people increases we have: Embedded Image

In a complete susceptible population which S(t) ≈ N the Eq. (5) can be written as the following: Embedded Image

According to Eq. 6 and definition of R0 we have: Embedded Image

Due to the infection of all provinces of Iran, N is assumed to be the population of Iran (81800269 in 2018) which was obtained from the World Bank [7].

We model epidemic spreading in the period from February 21, 2020 to April 21, 2020. Table 1. Shows the number of reported infected cases and reported removed cases by Iran ministry of health and medical education (MOHME) [3]. MOHME reported the first two cases of COVID-19 infections and their death on 19 February, 2020 which is indicated as day zero in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

The number of infectious and removed people reported by Iranian governments

Results

The Runge-Kutta method is used to resolve the SIR model’s ODEs to fit model on reported data. Numerical simulation is conducted in MATLAB and we tune the parameters β and γ to have the best fit plot on reported data plot. We then estimate the basic reproduction number by dividing β on γ. The SIR model fitting results are shown in Fig. 1 Through Fig. 4. The red and green plots are model plots and the blue and pink plots are reported data plots. As shown in Fig. 1, we estimated that the R0 to be 4.86 in the first week of outbreak which is significantly larger than one. We then set β = 0.585 and γ = 0.13 to fit model to reported data of the second week and we obtained Rt = 4.5 which is smaller than the first week. In Fig. 3 we obtained Rt = 4.29 for the 13th day to 16th day of outbreak. Fig. 4 shows that the reproduction number significantly decreased to 2.37 between March 6, 2020 to April 3, 2020, which could be the consequence of self-quarantining and reducing working time by government. As Nowruz occurred on March 20, 2020, many businesses as well as government offices closed and the government restricted travelling between provinces for almost three weeks. As a consequence of this policy it can be seen at Fig 5. that the reproduction number declined to one between April 4 and April 6, 2020. Fig. 6 shows that since April 7, 2020 the reproduction number has been less than one which indicates that disease will decline.

Fig. 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 1:

Plot of COVID-19 outbreak on the first week

Fig. 2:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 2:

Plot of COVID-19 outbreak on the second week

Fig. 3:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 3:

Plot of COVID-19 outbreak from the 13th day to 16th.

Fig. 4:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 4:

Plot of COVID-19 outbreak from the 16th day to 44th.

Fig. 5:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 5:

Plot of COVID-19 outbreak from the 45th day to 47th.

Fig. 6:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 6:

Plot of COVID-19 outbreak from the 48th day to 62th.

Discussion

In this study, we employed SIR epidemic model, to fit the reported data in Iran and estimate the basic reproduction number of COVID-19 in Iran.

Previous studies estimated basic reproduction number between 2.2 and 4. Chen et.al [1] showed that the basic reproduction number of COVID-19 was 3.58 using the reported data in Wuhan City, China. Read et.al [8] showed that the R0 of COVID-19 was between 3.6 and 4. Zhao et.al [9] estimated R0 of COVID-19 to be between 2.24 and 3.58. Other researchers estimated R0 to be 2.68 [10], 2.6 [2] and 2.2 [11].

The simulation results of this study indicated that the R0 of COVID-19 was 4.86 in the first week of the outbreak which was significantly larger than one. The schools and universities closed in the first week and in the second week the effective reproduction number decreased to 4.5. In the second week the working time reduced and effective reproduction number decreased to 4.29 from 13th day to 16th. Comparing to the other researches, the results showed that R0 of COVID-19 in Iran in the early stages were higher than the previous estimated basic reproduction number [1][2][8][9][10][11].

In the next weeks of outbreak people decided to stay at home spontaneously and the government reduced the working time. The effective reproduction number decreased to 2.37 between March 6, 2020 and April 3, 2020. In Nowruz, the government restricted travelling and many businesses closed for three weeks. Hence, the reproduction number was reduced and it has been less than one since April 7.

Conclusion

Basic reproduction number of COVID-19 is an important parameter which is used to estimate the risk of COVID-19 outbreak. We estimated the basic reproduction number (R0) of COVID-19 outbreak in Iran using SIR model by fitting the model to official reported data. According to the results, it is observed that reproduction number of COVID-19 in Iran in the early stages 4.86, 4.5 and 4.29 are higher than the previous estimated [1][2][10].

Self-quarantine and control strategies implemented by government reduced the effective reproduction number of COVID-19 below one. However, it is necessary to continue social distancing and control travelling to prevent causing a second wave of outbreak.

Data Availability

Information related to the study is in the manuscript

Abbreviations

Covid-19 coronavirus; basic reproduction number; Iran.

Authors’ contributions

ES conducted the experiments and analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript; SS collected the reported cases data and review and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Availability of data and materials

Information related to the study is in the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Reference

  1. [1].↵
    T. Chen, J. Rui, Q. Wang, Z. Zhao, J.-A. Cui, and L. Yin, “A mathematical model for simulating the phase-based transmissibility of a novel coronavirus,” Infect. Dis. Poverty, vol. 9, no. 24, p. 2020.01.19.911669, 2020.
  2. [2].↵
    N. Imai et al., “Report 3: Transmissibility of 2019-nCoV,” Imp. Coll. London, pp. 2–6, 2020.
  3. [3].↵
    “Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME).”.
  4. [4].↵
    W. O. Kermack and a. G. McKendrick, “A Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics,” Proc. R. Soc. London, vol. 115, no. 772, pp. 700–721, 1927.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. [5].↵
    H. W. Hethcote, “The mathematics of infectious diseases,” SIAM Rev., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 599–653, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. [6].↵
    F. Brauer, “The Kermack-McKendrick epidemic model revisited,” Math. Biosci., vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 119–131, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. [7].↵
    “Iran, Islamic Rep.” [Online]. Available: https://data.worldbank.org/country/iran-islamic-rep?view=chart.
  8. [8].↵
    C. P. J. Jonathan M. Read1, Jessica R.E. Bridgen1, Derek A.T. Cummings2, Antonia Ho3, “Novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV: early estimation of epidemiological parameters and epidemic predictions,” medrxiv, 2020.
  9. [9].↵
    S. Zhao et al., “Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak,” Int. J. Infect. Dis., vol. 92, pp. 214–217, 2020.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. [10].↵
    J. T. Wu, K. Leung, and G. M. Leung, “Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study,” Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10225, pp. 689–697, 2020.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. [11].↵
    Q. Li et al., “Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia,” N. Engl. J. Med., pp. 1–9, 2020.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 23, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Estimating the reproduction number of COVID-19 in Iran using epidemic modeling
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Estimating the reproduction number of COVID-19 in Iran using epidemic modeling
Ebrahim Sahafizadeh, Samaneh Sartoli
medRxiv 2020.03.20.20038422; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.20.20038422
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Estimating the reproduction number of COVID-19 in Iran using epidemic modeling
Ebrahim Sahafizadeh, Samaneh Sartoli
medRxiv 2020.03.20.20038422; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.20.20038422

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (434)
  • Allergy and Immunology (758)
  • Anesthesia (222)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3312)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (366)
  • Dermatology (282)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1175)
  • Epidemiology (13397)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (900)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5175)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (785)
  • Health Informatics (3283)
  • Health Policy (1145)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1198)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1022)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14650)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (915)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (128)
  • Nephrology (525)
  • Neurology (4949)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (734)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (888)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (797)
  • Oncology (2530)
  • Ophthalmology (730)
  • Orthopedics (284)
  • Otolaryngology (348)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (547)
  • Pediatrics (1305)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (558)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4223)
  • Public and Global Health (7525)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1713)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1018)
  • Respiratory Medicine (981)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (500)
  • Sports Medicine (425)
  • Surgery (551)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (237)
  • Urology (206)