Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

How to improve adherence with quarantine: Rapid review of the evidence

View ORCID ProfileRebecca K. Webster, Samantha K. Brooks, Louise E. Smith, Lisa Woodland, Simon Wessely, G. James Rubin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.20037408
Rebecca K. Webster
1King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rebecca K. Webster
  • For correspondence: rebecca.webster@kcl.ac.uk
Samantha K. Brooks
1King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise E. Smith
1King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Woodland
1King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Wessely
1King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. James Rubin
1King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives The January 2020 outbreak of coronavirus has once again thrown the vexed issue of quarantine into the spotlight, with many countries asking their citizens to ‘self-isolate’ if they have potentially come into contact with the infection. However, adhering to quarantine is difficult. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence to increase the likelihood of people adhering to protocols. We conducted a rapid review to identify factors associated with adherence to quarantine during infectious disease outbreaks.

Study design Rapid evidence review.

Methods We searched Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science for published literature on the reasons for and factors associated with adherence to quarantine during an infectious disease outbreak.

Results We found 3163 papers and included 14 in the review. Adherence to quarantine ranged from as little as 0 up to 92.8%. The main factors which influenced or were associated with adherence decisions were the knowledge people had about the disease and quarantine procedure, social norms, perceived benefits of quarantine and perceived risk of the disease, as well as practical issues such as running out of supplies or the financial consequences of being out of work.

Conclusions People vary in their adherence to quarantine during infectious disease outbreaks. To improve this, public health officials should provide a timely, clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols; emphasise social norms to encourage this altruistic behaviour; increase the perceived benefit that engaging in quarantine will have on public health; and ensure that sufficient supplies of food, medication and other essentials are provided.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with the University of East Anglia and Newcastle University. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care or Public Health England.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Addresses and positions Rebecca K Webster: King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK, Email: Rebecca.webster{at}kcl.ac.uk, Phone: +44 20 7848 5686, Post-Doctoral Research Associate

  • Samantha K Brooks: King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK, Post-Doctoral Research Worker

  • Louise E Smith: King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK, Post-Doctoral Research Associate

  • Lisa Woodland: King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK, PhD Student

  • Simon Wessely: King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK, Regius Professor of Psychiatry

  • G James Rubin: King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK, Reader in the Psychology of Emerging Health Risks

  • Funding The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with the University of East Anglia and Newcastle University. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care or Public Health England.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethical approval Not required – review.

  • Role of the funding source The sponsor and funder of the study had no role in study design, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Data Availability

None available. This is a rapid review and not based on original data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 20, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How to improve adherence with quarantine: Rapid review of the evidence
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How to improve adherence with quarantine: Rapid review of the evidence
Rebecca K. Webster, Samantha K. Brooks, Louise E. Smith, Lisa Woodland, Simon Wessely, G. James Rubin
medRxiv 2020.03.17.20037408; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.20037408
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How to improve adherence with quarantine: Rapid review of the evidence
Rebecca K. Webster, Samantha K. Brooks, Louise E. Smith, Lisa Woodland, Simon Wessely, G. James Rubin
medRxiv 2020.03.17.20037408; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.20037408

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (228)
  • Allergy and Immunology (506)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1245)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (534)
  • Epidemiology (10032)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2467)
  • Geriatric Medicine (238)
  • Health Economics (480)
  • Health Informatics (1647)
  • Health Policy (754)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (637)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11872)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (253)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2290)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (352)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1249)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (325)
  • Pediatrics (734)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2281)
  • Public and Global Health (4844)
  • Radiology and Imaging (843)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (492)
  • Respiratory Medicine (652)
  • Rheumatology (286)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (269)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)