Summary
Background What are the health and wellbeing of people in China during the COVID-19 outbreak? We aim to assess the health and wellbeing of normal adults living and working after one month of confinement to contain the COVID-19 outbreak in China.
Methods One month into the COVID-19 public emergency, on Feb 20–21, 2020, we surveyed 369 adults in 64 cities in China that varied in their rates of confirmed coronavirus cases on the eight dimensions of health (SF12), distress (K6) and life satisfaction. The participants also reported their work status, whether they had chronic health issues, and the number of hours they exercised per day in the past week.
Findings In general, people’s lives have been severely disrupted. One third (33%) of the participants had not left their home at all during the previous one month due to the restrictive measures to contain COVID-19 in China. Of the sample, 27% of the participants worked at the office, 38% resorted to working from home, and 25% stopped working due to the outbreak. Those who stopped working reported worse health conditions by SF12 as well as distress (K6). The severity of COVID-19 in an individual’s home city predicts their life satisfaction, and this relationship is moderated by individuals’ existing chronic health issues and their hours of exercise.
Interpretation Our findings support the need to pay attention to the health of people who were not affected by the virus epidemiologically. We especially need to support people who stopped working during the outbreak. Our results also highlight that physically active people, as indicated by more hours of exercise, might be more susceptible to wellbeing issues due to the lockdown. Policymakers who are considering introducing restrictive measures to contain COVID-19 may benefit from understanding such health and wellbeing implications.
Evidence before this study We have searched the leading journals (e.g. Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine), which have published articles on restrictive measures to contain COVID-19 epidemiologically. However, such restrictive measures disrupt people’s normal work and life, with many people having to stop working or working from home, which in turn may impact the health and wellbeing of people. These concerns have triggered Lancet COVID-19 series to publish one article that reviewed the psychological impact of quarantine in general to inform the impact of COVID-19 and another article that warned of the possible impact of home confinement on children. To our best knowledge, no study has provided field evidence on the health and wellbeing of people who did not have the virus but have been confined in varying degrees over a month due to COVID-19.
Added value of this study This study provides the implications of the restrictive measures during COVID-19 on the health and wellbeing of people who were not infected by the virus themselves but resided in affected areas. This study identifies that people who stopped working in the outbreak had worse health (SF12), more distress (K6) and less life satisfaction. Moreover, the severity of COVID-19 predicts life satisfaction more for people with chronic health issues or who exercised more.
Implications of all the available evidence The identification of whose health and wellbeing is more affected, not by the virus directly, but by living in COVID-19 affected regions, has implications for prioritizing help. Psychologists, mental health professionals and social workers can focus on the groups identified as more in need, since at least mental health issues can still be addressed online during the lockdown. Policymakers considering restrictive measures can use our early evidence in China to understand the impact of confinement policies on the health of the general public.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
not applicable
Funding Statement
We thank the funding from the National Social Science Foundation, China (Grant number: 1509093), which helped the data collection.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
upon request
