Abstract
Context In large population-based studies, there are a lack of existing questionnaires designed to ascertain menstrual cycle characteristics and tools to assess androgen excess including hirsutism, alopecia, and acne.
Objective Our objective was to create and evaluate an online survey instrument for identification of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) using self-reported menstrual cycle characteristics and novel pictorial tools for self-evaluation of androgen excess characteristics.
Methods Questions to assess menstrual characteristics and health were designed using existing surveys and clinical experience. Pictorial self-assessment tools for androgen excess were also developed with an experienced medical illustrator to include the modified Ferrimen-Galway, acne and androgenic alopecia. These were combined into an online survey instrument using REDCap and cognitively tested to assess question comprehension. The survey was revised based on feedback and subsequently used in the Ovulation and Menstruation (OM) Health Pilot study.
Results A survey instrument was created which includes assessment of menstrual cycle characteristics and pictorial tools for levels of androgen excess. Cognitive testing identified questions and concepts not easily comprehended, recalled, or had problematic response choices. Comprehension examples include simplifying the definition for PCOS and revising questions on historic menstrual regularity and bleeding duration. Recall and answer formation examples include issues with recalling waist size, beverage consumption, and interpretation of questions using symbols (> or <).
Conclusion We present a cognitively tested, novel survey instrument to assess menstrual cycle characteristics and androgen excess. This survey instrument is a novel tool to ascertain the prevalence of PCOS in general population settings.
What is already known on this subject Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), is the most common reproductive disorder in women of reproductive age. In large population-based studies, there are a lack of question sets designed for the ascertainment of menstrual cycle characteristics and tools to assess androgen excess necessary for diagnosis of PCOS.
What this study adds Our team created an online survey instrument that underwent rigorous cognitive testing to ensure cognitively complex reproductive questions could be understood at an 8th grade reading level. Our goal was to identify obvious questionnaire problems which could impact participant comprehension and readability. The development and cognitive testing of this survey instrument may provide a better way to capture PCOS prevalence in future studies. We propose the use of this study as an example that validating survey questions can provide important insight into capturing accurate data from diverse groups of participants.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Shruthi Mahalingaiah was supported by the Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health (BIRCWH K12) HD043444, the Reproductive Scientist Development Program (RSDP K12) HD000849, the RSDP 2017 SEED grant, the Ellison Family Foundation 2018 Grant, and a 2018 SEED grant from the OB/GYN department at Boston Medical Center. This project was part of the work awarded the 2016 Early Investigator award by the Endocrine Society and Merck & Co.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Reprint Requests: Shruthi Mahalingaiah, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Building 1 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Data Availability
Harvard Dataverse: Mahalingaiah, Shruthi, 2020, "The Ovulation and Menstruation Study Report on Cognitive Testing of Survey Instrument, July 5, 2017", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/J0CL9O, Harvard Dataverse, V1
https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/J0CL9O