Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Clinical significance of IgM and IgG test for diagnosis of highly suspected COVID-19 infection

Xingwang Jia, Pengjun Zhang, Yaping Tian, Junli Wang, Huadong Zeng, Jun Wang, Jiao Liu, Zeyan Chen, Lijun Zhang, Haihong He, Kunlun He, Yajie Liu
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.28.20029025
Xingwang Jia
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pengjun Zhang
2Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Interventional Therapy Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yaping Tian
3Department of Translational Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junli Wang
4Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huadong Zeng
4Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun Wang
4Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiao Liu
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zeyan Chen
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lijun Zhang
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haihong He
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kunlun He
3Department of Translational Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
5Key Laboratory of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of Biomedical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kunlunhe@plagh.org docliu18@qq.com
Yajie Liu
6Department of Neurology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kunlunhe@plagh.org docliu18@qq.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Quick, simple and accurate diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 is very important for the screening and therapy of patients. Although several methods were performed in clinical practice, however, the IgM and IgG diagnostic value evaluation was little performed. 57 suspected COVID-19 infection patients were enrolled in our study. 24 patients with positive and 33 patients with negative nucleic acid test. The positive rate of COVID-19 nucleic acid was 42.10%. The positive detection rate of combination of IgM and IgG for patients with COVID-19 negative and positive nucleic acid test was 72.73% and 87.50%. The results were significantly higher than the nucleic acid or IgM, IgG single detection. hsCRP in the COVID-19 nucleic acid negative group showed significantly higher than the positive groups (P=0.0298). AST in the COVID-19 IgM negative group showed significantly lower than the positive groups (P=0.0365). We provided a quick, simple, accurate aided detection method for the suspected patients and on-site screening in close contact with the population.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University (NYSZYYEC20200009)

Funding Statement

No Funding supported this study

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 12, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical significance of IgM and IgG test for diagnosis of highly suspected COVID-19 infection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Clinical significance of IgM and IgG test for diagnosis of highly suspected COVID-19 infection
Xingwang Jia, Pengjun Zhang, Yaping Tian, Junli Wang, Huadong Zeng, Jun Wang, Jiao Liu, Zeyan Chen, Lijun Zhang, Haihong He, Kunlun He, Yajie Liu
medRxiv 2020.02.28.20029025; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.28.20029025
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Clinical significance of IgM and IgG test for diagnosis of highly suspected COVID-19 infection
Xingwang Jia, Pengjun Zhang, Yaping Tian, Junli Wang, Huadong Zeng, Jun Wang, Jiao Liu, Zeyan Chen, Lijun Zhang, Haihong He, Kunlun He, Yajie Liu
medRxiv 2020.02.28.20029025; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.28.20029025

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (228)
  • Allergy and Immunology (506)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1244)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (532)
  • Epidemiology (10027)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2462)
  • Geriatric Medicine (238)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1645)
  • Health Policy (753)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (636)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (535)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11871)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (252)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2289)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (352)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1248)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (325)
  • Pediatrics (733)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (314)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2281)
  • Public and Global Health (4840)
  • Radiology and Imaging (838)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (492)
  • Respiratory Medicine (651)
  • Rheumatology (286)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (240)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (268)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)