Abstract
Objectives To investigate patient-perceived facilitators and barriers to home-based rehabilitation exercise and general physical activity after THA.
Design Using a qualitative design, twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using an interpretive thematic analysis approach, with theoretical underpinning from the concept conduct of everyday life. The study is embedded within the PHETHAS-1 trial, quantitatively investigating recovery outcomes after a home-based rehabilitation exercise program.
Setting A regional hospital in Denmark between January 2018 and May 2019.
Participants Twenty-two patients who had undergone THA and performed home-based rehabilitation exercise.
Results The main theme “Wishing to return to the well-known everyday life” and the subtheme “General physical activity versus rehabilitation exercise” were identified. Generally, the participants found the home-based rehabilitation exercise boring but were motivated by the goal of returning to their habitual conduct of everyday life and perform their usual general physical activities. Participants enrolled in the PHETHAS-1 study used the enrollment as part of their motivation for doing the exercises.
Both pain and no pain were identified as barriers for doing the home-based rehabilitation exercise. Pain could cause insecurity while no pain could cause the rehabilitation exercise to be perceived as pointless.
Conclusions The overall goal for the THA patients was to return to their habitual everyday life. This goal served as a facilitator for undertaking home-based rehabilitation exercise. Being able to perform their usual activities paradoxically became a barrier for some of the participants, as they were more motivated towards general physical activity than the rehabilitation exercise.
Key messages
Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty have goal of returning to their habitual everyday life doing their usual physical activities.
Home-based rehabilitation exercise can be perceived as boring and time-consuming and the goal of returning to their habitual everyday life serves as a facilitator to perform the rehabilitation exercise.
What this paper adds
Both pain and no pain can be a barrier to performing home-based rehabilitation exercise.
Pain can cause uncertainty as to whether performing an exercise could be harmful, while no pain can cause the rehabilitation exercise to be perceived as pointless.
Standard care patients tend to modify the rehabilitation program as they are gradually able to perform their usual general physical activities.
Enrolment in clinical studies and contact with health professionals can facilitate adherence to home-based rehabilitation exercise.
Trial identifier NCT03109821
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
A qualitative study. Not a clinical trial.
Funding Statement
PHETHAS-2 has received funding from; The family Kjaersgaard foundation. PHETHAS-1 has received funding from; Regional Hospital Central Jutland Research Foundation, The Danish Rheumatism Association, The Association of Danish Physiotherapists, The Aase and Ejnar Danielsen Foundation.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
anngrora{at}rm.dk, dgjanni{at}gmail.com, Merete.madsen{at}midt.rm.dk, lonemike{at}rm.dk, thomas.quaade.bandholm{at}regionh.dk, caross{at}rm.dk
Declarations of interest: none.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the privacy of research participants.
