Epidemiology and preclinical management of dog bites among humans in Wakiso and Kampala districts, Uganda: Implications for prevention of dog bites and rabies

Introduction

Rabies, a neglected tropical disease, is estimated to cause 59,000 human deaths, over 3.7 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and USD 8.6 billion in economic losses worldwide annually [1]. Although the rabies virus can infect all mammals, over 99% of all human rabies cases are transmitted through dog bites [2]. Consequently, in addition to mass dog vaccination that breaks rabies transmission cycles, strategies for prevention of rabies in humans include prevention of dog bites and appropriate post-exposure treatment (PET) [2, 3].

World Health Organization (WHO) has developed guidelines for dog bite victims before presenting to a healthcare facility (preclinical management) as well as how the cases must be managed in the healthcare facility (clinical guidelines) [4]. These preclinical guidelines are summarized as: wash the bite wound with running water for 15 minutes; disinfect the wound with substances with capacity to kill the rabies virus (soap, disinfectant); and seek medical care immediately to receive post-exposure prophylaxis vaccines. Appropriate washing and disinfection of wounds can prevent one-third of rabies infections [3, 5]. Inadequate dog bite wound care has been associated with increased likelihood of PET failure and progression to rabies [5, 6].

Pre-clinical practices that deviate from recommendations have been reported to include not seeking medical care following dog-bites [7], delay in seeking treatment [3, 8, 9], lack of wound washing or treatment of wounds with chilies, salt, turmeric powder, lime, snuff powder, paste of leaves, acid and ash provided by traditional healers and magicians [10, 11]. Non-compliance to the preclinical guidelines has been attributed to geographical, social, economic, cultural, organizational, dog and wound factors [12-15].

In Uganda, there are an estimated over 30,000 animal bites reported to healthcare facilities annually and the burden keeps on rising despite ongoing interventions like health education [16]. The country had approximately 486 suspected human rabies deaths between 2001 and 2015 [17] although some authors have estimated the per capita annual death rate from rabies to be at 0.39/100,000 [18]. Despite such a high burden of bites and rabies, the reports of delays in seeking medical care and victims treating dog bite wounds with traditional herbal concoctions remain largely anecdotal. There is barely any published data on pre-clinical management of dog-bites in Uganda. In this study, we investigated the epidemiology and preclinical management of dog bites in Wakiso and Kampala districts, Uganda. We include data on circumstances of dog bites and what influences people’s responses dog-bites with a view of identifying opportunities for prevention of dog bites and rabies.

Methods

Results

The total number of dog-bite patients enrolled in the study was 376. Of these, 201(54%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 18 (22.75)18 years. One hundred and ninety (50.5%) of the patients were from Wakiso district. Eleven percent of the bite-patients reported to own at least one dog while only 5.1% had ever been vaccinated against rabies. Nearly three-quarters (72%) had ever received some information about dogs and dog bites from sources including friends (46%), family (14%), school (10%), and books (4%). Some victims (8%) reported to have suffered dog- bites previously. A summary of the socio-demographic characteristics of the dog-bite patients, dog-ownership and sources of information on dog-bites for the study participants is provided in Table 1.

Discussion

The study investigated the epidemiology of dog bites and preclinical practices for the victims in the context of dog bite prevention and rabies prevention respectively. The finding that there were more males than females is in concurrence with majority of studies that have reported a preponderance for males [9, 22]. Some authors attribute this to personality variation between genders with more males being subject to dog bites [23]. Others have attributes it to males being frequently involved in day and night activities [9]. However, our findings contradict some studies which reported that females are more likely to be bitten [24].

Regardless of age, the leg was the most affected part of the body followed by hands and arms. Limbs have been documented to be the most bitten parts [25-27]. This may be attributed to accessibility, especially for the legs, and the struggles that usually ensue during the bite. Such scuffles usually involve use of arms and legs to ward off the dog. However, bites on the head were among children only and this may be explained by their height which puts the head near the mouth of the dog. Likewise, some authors have attributed this to the small physique of children, their inclination to put their faces close to animals, and limited motor skills to provide defense [22].

Majority of wounds were Category II involving skin scratches. This is expected especially when the majority of wounds were singular in number and extremities were the most affected parts. These parts are not only accessible by dogs but they are easily movable in self-defense. Given that most of the victims were walking, it was unlikely that biting dogs got a firm grasp of the victim before disentanglement. Besides, dog attacks usually last a very brief duration, which explains why very severe and fatal bites are not a common finding in literature, just like in our study. Such findings on severity are consistent with other studies [28] though they conflict with some [29].

The owner of the biting dogs was not known in most cases (53.5%). This is perhaps because majority of victims were bitten on the road or in public places like markets. Notably, the study area is mostly urban, and characterized by rapid urbanization, high population of people, abundance of garbage heaps that serve as a source food for dogs and un-owned animals especially dogs. In addition, it might be due to some dog owners not chaining their dogs and leaving them to wander hence posing a risk of bites to strangers. Some authors have attributed it to weak legislation on responsible dog ownership [30]. Just like in our study, the increased risk of bite events by such dogs compared to those with known owners has been reported in India [31] and Nigeria [26] though in Mozambique [32], they play a minor role. This shows that the role of wandering dogs in the bites may vary with each setting.

For majority of bites, it is the victims that approached the dogs rather than the other way round. Territorial invasion easily forces dogs to bite out of self-defense. Such a risk increases when dogs are in a pack or nursing young ones as explained in the in-depth interviews for our study. Studies have widely reported increased dog aggression due to territorial invasion especially by children [33, 34]. Our findings on this are consistent with that of related study in the United Kingdom which reported 50% of the victims as having approached the biting dog [35].

Before presentation to hospital, only 18.6% of the patients had complied with recommended preclinical guidelines. The WHO recommends meticulously flushing of wounds with water and soap and application of an antiseptic like povidone iodine if available [2]. The low level of compliance in our study may be due to inadequate knowledge on the guidelines. Moreover, many respondents expressed not knowing what to do immediately the dog bit them. However, our prevalence is comparable with that reported in India which varied between 2 −21% depending on the township [36]. Nonetheless, in India still, another study reported a higher rate (58%) than ours though there was a significant rural-urban divide with the former performing worse [37]. This, combined with an 7% - 45% prevalence of wound washing with soap and water in Kenya and Ethiopia respectively [38, 39], is evidence of how the practice varies across communities. It may also indicate variations in the coverage and uptake of health education interventions across societies.

Of those who applied some substances before reporting for PET, only 23.8% applied an antiseptic as recommended. A comparable proportion applied herbs whereas others used antibiotics, black stone, charcoal, acid, powder made by burning hair of biting dog, split beans, paraffin, salt, monetary coins and others. The inquiry into application of non-recommended material revealed that such practices were driven by a number of factors including individual beliefs on efficacy, lack of funds to pay for medical services as well community influences and advice. Such practices have been reported elsewhere with higher magnitudes being reported in both community [36, 37] and hospital based surveys [40].

Victims who were bitten by a dog with known ownership were 35% less likely to comply. Sometimes it is intuitive that a person bitten by a dog of known ownership might be more confident with regard to the health status of the dog compared to a bite by a dog they do not know. If the owner is known, it is easier to inquire about the health aspects of the dog like the rabies vaccination status. However, this practice of victims assessing the risk of rabies to be low based on knowing the dog ownership is dangerous and should be discouraged. Nonetheless, our findings are in concurrence with another study in Ethiopia which found that the likelihood of the dog bite victim visiting a healthcare facility more than doubled when the victim was bitten by a dog of unknown ownership [41].

Victims who were employed at the time of the bite were approximately one and half times more likely to comply with the guidelines than those who were not. This may probably be due to the fact that the employed tend to have higher education levels. Besides, employment has been associated with appropriate health seeking behavior in some studies [42]. Similar, those who perceived the biting dog as being sick were more than twice likely to comply compared to those who perceived them as being healthy. It may be that victims attached the sickness perception to an elevated risk for rabies and therefore complied to the pre-clinical preventive measures. Besides, some studies have described the health status of a biting animal as a drive to PET compliance [43]

Participants who had attained at least secondary education or higher were more likely to comply with pre-clinical guidelines compared to those with no formal education. People who are more educated tend to have a higher ability of interpreting health education messages. Moreover, in our study, those with secondary education or more were more likely to access information on dogs and dog bites than those with less education level. Our findings and probable explanation are coherent with research that has suggested that people with higher education tend to have more knowledge about rabies than illiterate ones [44, 45].

Patients aged above fifteen years were less likely to comply compared to those below 15 years. this finding is in consistent with that of a study in China that found age ?15 as being at more risk of failure to begin PEP [46]. Prioritization of younger ones to receive healthcare was evident in this study. When asked why the daughter was sent to receive treatment and the mother stayed home yet they had both been bitten by the same dog, the mother explained that the young one had more need for treatment. So, with limited resources and lack of knowledge that treatment was free, priority seemed to be given to younger ones.

Patients who did not know whether the biting dog had gone on to bite other people were 65% less likely to comply. Cases of a single dog being responsible for multiple bite cases have been widely described [47, 48] and this is typical of wandering dogs. The finding that some people did not know may be a reflection of the care-free attitude of such individuals towards the risk of bite consequences. Not caring to find out whether the dog bit other people makes them not likely to comply as they may not know the value in ascertaining the status of the dog. Nonetheless, deeper inquiries revealed that some respondents did not comply even after knowing that the dog had gone on to bite other people. However, they attributed this to lack of funds to seek treatment.

The main limitation of this study may be the self-reports about the events which might have introduced recall bias through inaccuracies in detailing the events. However, we verified the information where possible by triangulation. In addition, we used a hospital-based convenience sample and this limits the representativeness of our results for the entire population of dog bite victims. An example of this may be that there may be specific factors that influenced our respondents to report to hospital but not those who stayed home and used domestic remedies. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted within this context.

Conclusions

The study presents evidence to show that dog bites in the study area are widespread across gender and age. The bites are both provoked and unprovoked and are majorly by wandering dogs in public places like roads. Compliance to recommended pre-clinical guidelines is low and mainly due to inadequate awareness about dangers of alternative treatments and availability of therapy. There is therefore need for holistic targeted health education programs and regulation of herbalist activities. In addition, approaches that reduce human-dog interactions in public places for example reduction of stray dog populations, need emphasis.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Map showing the location and geographical details of the two districts from which the study participants were got. Kampala Capital City Authority serves as the capital city of Uganda. It is divided into five administrative units called “divisions” and has an estimated human population of 1.5 million. Approximately 8% of households in Kampala own dogs. The average number of dogs owned per household is 1.7. Wakiso district is divided into 18 administrative units called sub-counties with a population of approximately 2 million people. Approximately 14% of households in Wakiso own dogs. The ownership stands at 1.9 dogs per household. However, the population of stray and free-roaming dogs in both districts is not known. Much as Mulago and Entebbe Hospitals are located in Kampala and Wakiso respectively, dog bite patients from either district can report to any of the healthcare facilities to receive PET.

S1 Table. Variables that were studied, indicating their categorization and measures. The factors were organized into host / patient factors, including socio-demographics and those that influence the vulnerability of people to dog bites. Some factors on biting dogs were also studied to give a clear indication of how they influence the dogs to bite as well as the practices of the victims after the bite. Factors on the circumstances of the particular dog bite event were categorized into pre-bite, during the bite and post-bite factors. The intention of this was to study why the event happened and the wound management practices thereafter. The measures indicate how the variable was recorded and / or categorized.

S2 Table. Characteristics of biting dogs as reported by the 376 study participants from Wakiso and Kampala districts, Uganda. The characteristics were reported by the dog bite victims or their caretakers, if they knew the details of the biting dog. The frequencies of such characteristics are presented by the specific district of residence and the differences in distribution of characteristics is indicated by the corresponding p-value. Notably, all study participants were residents of the district where the bite event happened.

S3 Table. Summary of circumstances of the dog bites, immediate actions taken by victims and reasons for different applications and health seeking behavior. Ten themes were synthesized out of the in-depth interviews to explain the circumstances in which bite events happened. Immediate actions taken by bite victims were categorized into four. For those who applied different substances to the bite wounds, the reasons for their choice and actions were recorded into five categories. The same was done to explain why victims went to herbalists, healthcare facilities or had a simultaneous resort.