ABSTRACT
Purpose Quality improvement (QI) in healthcare is a cultural transformation process that requires long-term commitment from the executive board. As such, an overview of QI applications and their impact needs to be made routinely visible. We explored how routine reporting could be developed for QI governance.
Design We developed a retrospective evaluation of QI projects in an NHS healthcare organisation. The evaluation was conducted as an online survey so that the data accrual process resembled routine reporting to help identify implementation challenges. A purposive sample of QI projects was identified to maximise contrast between projects that were or were not successful as determined by the resident QI team. To hone strategic focus in what should be reported, we also compared factors that might affect project outcomes.
Findings Out of 52 QI projects, 10 led to a change in routine practice (‘adoption’). Details of project outcomes were limited. Project team outcomes, indicative of capacity building, were not systematically documented. Service user involvement, quality of measurement plan, fidelity of plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles had a major impact on adoption. We discussed how routine visibility of these factors may aid QI governance.
Originality Designing a routine reporting framework is an iterative process involving continual dialogue with frontline staff and improvement specialists to navigate data accrual demands. We demonstrated how a retrospective evaluation, as in this study, can yield empirical insights to support dialogue around QI governance, thereby honing the implementation science of QI in a healthcare organisation.
Competing Interest Statement
NS is the director of the London Safety and Training Solutions Ltd, which offers training in patient safety, implementation solutions and human factors to healthcare organisations and the pharmaceutical industry. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Statement
NS research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London at Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation trust. NS and KC are members of Kings Improvement Science, which offers co-funding to the NIHR ARC South London and is based at Kings College London. Its work is funded by Kings Health Partners (Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation trust, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation trust, Kings College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation trust), and Guys and St Thomas Charity. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the charities, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Ethics statement: According to the policy activities that constitute research at the South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, this work met criteria for operational improvement activities exempt from ethics review.
Data Availability Statement: Data are available upon request from the corresponding author.
Funding NS’ research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation trust. NS and KC are members of King’s Improvement Science, which offers co-funding to the NIHR ARC South London and is based at King’s College London. Its work is funded by King’s Health Partners (Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation trust, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation trust, King’s College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation trust), and Guy’s and St Thomas’ Charity. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the charities, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
COI statement: NS is the director of the London Safety and Training Solutions Ltd, which offers training in patient safety, implementation solutions and human factors to healthcare organisations and the pharmaceutical industry. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Data Availability
Data are available upon request from the corresponding author