Abstract
Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is strongly associated with favorable outcome. We examined the utility of serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing for predicting pCR and risk of metastatic recurrence in 84 high-risk early breast cancer patients treated in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated from 291 plasma samples collected at pretreatment (T0), 3 weeks after initiation of paclitaxel (T1), between paclitaxel and anthracycline regimens (T2), or prior to surgery (T3). A personalized ctDNA test was designed to detect 16 patient-specific mutations (from whole exome sequencing of pretreatment tumor) in cfDNA by ultra-deep sequencing. At T0, 61 of 84 (73%) patients were ctDNA-positive, which decreased over time (T1-35%; T2-14%; T3-9%). Patients who remained ctDNA-positive at T1 were significantly more likely to have residual disease after NAC (83% non-pCR) compared to those who cleared ctDNA (52% non-pCR; OR 4.33, P=0.012). After NAC, all patients who achieved pCR were ctDNA-negative (n=17, 100%). For those who did not achieve pCR (n=43), ctDNA-positive patients (14%) had significantly increased risk of metastatic recurrence (HR 10.4; 95% CI, 2.3–46.6); interestingly, patients who did not achieve pCR but were ctDNA-negative (86%) had excellent outcome, similar to those who achieved pCR (HR 1.4; 95% CI, 0.15–13.5). Lack of ctDNA clearance was a significant predictor of poor response and metastatic recurrence, while clearance was associated with improved survival regardless of pCR status. Personalized monitoring of ctDNA during NAC may aid in real-time assessment of treatment response and help fine-tune pCR as a surrogate endpoint of survival.
Competing Interest Statement
Conflict of interest disclosures: The following authors are employees of Natera, Inc. (Himanshu Sethi, Hsin-Ta Wu, Raheleh Salari, Antony Tin, Svetlana Shchegrova, Hemant Pawar, Paul Billings, Alexey Aleshin, Maggie Louie, Bernhard Zimmermann). Laura van ’t Veer is co-founder, stockholder and part-time employee of Agendia NV. The rest of the authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded in part by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF) (L.J.V. Veer), and the Breast Cancer Research Fund at UCSF (L.J.V. Veer) and NIH/NCI P01CA210961 (L.J. Esserman). ctDNA analysis was provided by Natera without cost.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be available upon request from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium.
