ABSTRACT
Background Erector spinae plane (ESP) block has been reported to provide analgesia in spine surgery in case reports or case series, and there have been no controlled studies to date evaluating its efficacy. We aimed to exam the roles of ESP block in lumbar surgery in a single center randomized control trial by injecting local analgesic into the interfacial plane between the erector spinae muscles and the transverse process under ultrasound guidance.
Methods Consecutive elective lumbar surgery patients were randomized into either a control group (general anesthesia only, Group G, N=32) or a treatment group (general anesthesia plus ESP block, Group E, N=30). Several parameters including visual analog scale (VAS, primary outcome), perioperative anesthetics and analgesics usage, indexes of hemodynamics variation, return of bowel function and overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS) were measured.
Results Significant differences in VAS scores over time were found between the two matched groups (P = 0.010). Group E patients had significantly lower pain scores than Group G patients in the early postoperative period within the first 6 hr. Group G and Group E VAS scores peaked at 1 hr and 12 hr, respectively, and the peak pain score in Group G is significantly higher than that of Group E (P = 0.002). In addition, patients who received ESP block had lower perioperative analgesic and sedative medication requirements, improved satisfaction with pain management, more stable hemodynamics, and earlier bowel function return than those using general anesthesia alone.
Conclusion Pre-incision bilateral single injection ESP blocks provided effective analgesia perioperatively during lumbar laminoplasty, decreased perioperative anesthesia and analgesia requirement, and accelerated short-term recovery.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ChiCTR1900026706
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
Funding: The authors have no sources of funding to declare for this manuscript.
Data Availability
The study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR1900026706.
