Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Estimated effectiveness of traveller screening to prevent international spread of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

View ORCID ProfileKatelyn M. Gostic, Ana C. R. Gomez, View ORCID ProfileRiley O. Mummah, Adam J. Kucharski, View ORCID ProfileJames O. Lloyd-Smith
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.28.20019224
Katelyn M. Gostic
1University of Chicago, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Katelyn M. Gostic
  • For correspondence: kgostic{at}uchicago.edu jlloydsmith{at}ucla.edu
Ana C. R. Gomez
2University of California Los Angeles, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Riley O. Mummah
2University of California Los Angeles, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Riley O. Mummah
Adam J. Kucharski
3London School of Tropical Hygiene and Medicine, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James O. Lloyd-Smith
2University of California Los Angeles, United States
4Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James O. Lloyd-Smith
  • For correspondence: kgostic{at}uchicago.edu jlloydsmith{at}ucla.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Traveller screening is being used to limit further global spread of 2019 novel coronavirus (nCoV) following its recent emergence. Here, we analyze the expected impact of different travel screening programs given remaining uncertainty around the values of key nCoV life history and epidemiological parameters. Even under best-case assumptions, we estimate that screening will miss around half of infected travellers. Breaking down the factors leading to screening successes and failures, we find that most cases missed by screening are fundamentally undetectable, because they have not yet developed symptoms and are unaware they were exposed. These findings emphasize the need for measures to track travellers who become ill after being missed by a travel screening program. We make our model available for interactive use so stakeholders can explore scenarios of interest using the most up-to-date information. We hope these findings contribute to evidence-based policy to combat the spread of nCoV, and to prospective planning to mitigate future emerging pathogens.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

KG was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship in the program for understanding dynamic & multiscale systems from the James S. McDonnell foundation. AJK was supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (grant Number 206250/Z/17/Z). ROM and JOL-S was supported by NSF grants OCE-1335657 and DEB-1557022, SERDP RC-2635, and DARPA PREEMPT D18AC00031.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All relevant code is available at https://github.com/kgostic/traveller_screening. The model does not input any case data. All relevant inputs are present in the code, and described in Table 1 or in the manuscript text.

https://github.com/kgostic/traveller_screening

https://faculty.eeb.ucla.edu/lloydsmith/screeningmodel

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 30, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Estimated effectiveness of traveller screening to prevent international spread of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Estimated effectiveness of traveller screening to prevent international spread of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
Katelyn M. Gostic, Ana C. R. Gomez, Riley O. Mummah, Adam J. Kucharski, James O. Lloyd-Smith
medRxiv 2020.01.28.20019224; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.28.20019224
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Estimated effectiveness of traveller screening to prevent international spread of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
Katelyn M. Gostic, Ana C. R. Gomez, Riley O. Mummah, Adam J. Kucharski, James O. Lloyd-Smith
medRxiv 2020.01.28.20019224; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.28.20019224

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13377)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5154)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3270)
  • Health Policy (1141)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1191)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1018)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14631)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4925)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (725)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4213)
  • Public and Global Health (7506)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1014)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)