Abstract
Aim Clinical guidelines recommend non-surgical treatment before surgery is considered in patients eligible for knee replacement (KR). Surgical treatment is provided by orthopedic surgeons and exercise therapy is provided by physical therapists. This study aimed to investigate key stakeholder perspectives on pre-operative, home-based exercise therapy with one exercise-only in patients eligible for KR.
Methods This qualitative study is embedded within the QUADX-1 randomized trial that investigates a model of coordinated non-surgical and surgical treatment for patients eligible for KR. Physical therapists and orthopedic surgeons working with patients with knee osteoarthritis in their daily clinical work were interviewed (one focus group and four single interviews) to explore their perceived facilitators and barriers related to pre-operative home-based exercise therapy with one exercise-only in patients eligible for KR. Interviews were analyzed using content analysis.
Results From the content analysis three main themes emerged: 1) Physical therapists’ and orthopedic surgeons’ ambivalence in their professional roles, 2) Orthopedic surgeons view on exercise, and 3) Coordinated non-surgical and surgical care.
Conclusion We found that the pre-operative exercise intervention created ambivalence in the professional role of both the physical therapists and orthopedic surgeons. The physical therapists were skeptical towards over-simplified exercise therapy. The orthopedic surgeons were skeptical towards the potential lack of (long-term) effect of exercise therapy in patients eligible for KR. The consequence of these barriers and ambivalence in the professional role is important to consider when planning implementation of the model of coordinated non-surgical and surgical treatment.
Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02931058.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Dr. Troelsen reports personal fees from Zimmer Biomet, grants from Zimmer Biomet, personal fees from European Knee Society, outside the submitted work.
Clinical Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02931058.
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
This work was supported by The Capital Region’s strategic funds; grant number: [R142-A5363]; and The Capital Region’s fund for cross-continuum research: grant numbers: [P-2018-1-02, P-2019-1-03]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The anonymized transcribed interviews in Danish (we consider this the raw original data) is available by contacting the corresponding author Rasmus Skov Husted via email: rasmus.skov.husted@regionh.dk
