Optimizing Clinical Outcome and Toxicity in Lung Cancer Using a Genomic Marker of Radiosensitivity

ABSTRACT

While radiation therapy serves as the backbone for nearly 40% of all cancer cures, and is received by nearly 70% of all cancer patients at some point in their cancer journey, it has yet to enter the modern era of personalized medicine. While field shape and size is personalized anatomically for all patients, the dose of radiation is still prescribed in a one-size-fits-all manner. Given the reality of inter-tumoral heterogeneity demonstrated by cancer sequencing efforts, we propose that we are working under an outdated null hypothesis in our field: that all patients should respond the same to the same dose of radiation. We have previously developed a method by which to predict optimal dosing for a given patient, which we term the Genomically Adjusted Radiation Dose, given the a priori knowledge of a patient’s tumor genomics. Knowing how much dose a patient’s tumor requires for biological optimization provides the first opportunity to characterize the inefficienies of one-size-fits-all dosing schemes, that result in both over- and under-dosing for the majority of patients. To elucidate this inefficiency, and therefore the opportunity to improvement using a personalized dosing scheme, we develop a competing hazards-style mathematical model combining the canonical equations for tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities. Using data from two prospectively collected cohorts of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, we show how the results of a recent uniform dose escalation study can be explained by the biological innefficiency of empiric uniform dose escalation, and highlight the opportunities for improvement in radiation outcomes available today, without need for new technology or equipment.