Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Pushing the limits of recovery in chronic stroke survivors: User perceptions of the Queen Square Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Programme

K Kelly, F Brander, A Strawson, View ORCID ProfileNS Ward, View ORCID ProfileKS Hayward
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.05.19015099
K Kelly
1The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F Brander
1The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Strawson
1The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NS Ward
1The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
2Department of Clinical and Motor Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for NS Ward
KS Hayward
3Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences; AVERT Early Rehabilitation Research Group, Stroke Theme, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery; University of Melbourne, Heidelberg VIC 3084, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for KS Hayward
  • For correspondence: kate.hayward@unimelb.edu.au
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction The Queen Square Upper Limb (QSUL) Neurorehabilitation Programme is a clinical service within the National Health Service in the United Kingdom that provides 90 hours of therapy over three weeks to stroke survivors with persistent upper limb impairment. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of participants of this programme, including clinicians, stroke survivors and carers.

Design Descriptive qualitative.

Setting Clinical outpatient neurorehabilitation service.

Participants Clinicians (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, rehabilitation assistants) involved in the delivery of the QSUL Programme, as well as stroke survivors and carers who had participated in the programme were purposively sampled. Each focus group followed a series of semi-structured, open questions that were tailored to the clinical or stroke group. One independent researcher facilitated all focus groups, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed by four researchers using a thematic approach to identify main themes.

Results Four focus groups were completed: three including stroke survivors (n = 16) and carers (n =2), and one including clinicians (n = 11). The main stroke survivor themes related to psychosocial aspects of the programme (“you feel valued as an individual”), as well as the behavioural training provided (“gruelling, yet rewarding”). The main clinician themes also included psychosocial aspects of the programme (“patient driven ethos – no barriers, no rules”), and knowledge, skills and resources of clinicians (“it is more than intensity, it is complex”).

Conclusions As an intervention, the QSUL Programme is both comprehensive and complex. The impact of participation in the programme spans psychosocial and behavioural domains from the perspectives of both the stroke survivor and clinician.

Strengths and limitations

  • Descriptive qualitative study of the perception of users (stroke survivor, carer, clinician) engaged in the delivery of the Queen Square Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Programme, which is run at a single centre in the United Kingdom.

  • Focus groups were completed by a researcher independent of the programme, without the involvement of senior management to facilitate open discussion and critical reflection of the programme.

  • This study involved a sample of users that were involved in the programme in the previous 12-months.

  • Data coding was performed by four researchers enhancing the validity of the results.

  • As only two carers were included in the focus groups, their experience has limited representation in the results.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by funds from the Occupational Therapy Research Fund, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Available on request by a qualified researcher.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 13, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pushing the limits of recovery in chronic stroke survivors: User perceptions of the Queen Square Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Programme
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Pushing the limits of recovery in chronic stroke survivors: User perceptions of the Queen Square Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Programme
K Kelly, F Brander, A Strawson, NS Ward, KS Hayward
medRxiv 2020.01.05.19015099; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.05.19015099
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Pushing the limits of recovery in chronic stroke survivors: User perceptions of the Queen Square Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Programme
K Kelly, F Brander, A Strawson, NS Ward, KS Hayward
medRxiv 2020.01.05.19015099; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.05.19015099

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (50)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (451)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5258)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (195)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (757)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (213)
  • Health Informatics (698)
  • Health Policy (358)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (223)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (163)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5867)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (361)
  • Medical Education (104)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (764)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (130)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (142)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
  • Oncology (479)
  • Ophthalmology (152)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (95)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (862)
  • Public and Global Health (2011)
  • Radiology and Imaging (348)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
  • Respiratory Medicine (285)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (76)
  • Surgery (109)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)