Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort

Ramya Vijayram, Nikhita Damaraju, Ashley Xavier, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Sumit Misra, Shilpa Chopra, Ashok Khurana, Nitya Wadhwa, GARBH-Ini, Raghunathan Rengaswamy, Himanshu Sinha, Shinjini Bhatnagar
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.27.19016006
Ramya Vijayram
1Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering (IBSE), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikhita Damaraju
1Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering (IBSE), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashley Xavier
1Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering (IBSE), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bapu Koundinya Desiraju
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramachandran Thiruvengadam
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sumit Misra
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shilpa Chopra
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashok Khurana
5The Ultrasound Lab, Defence Colony, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nitya Wadhwa
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
Raghunathan Rengaswamy
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering (IBSE), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
6Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
7Robert Bosch Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (RBCDSAI), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Himanshu Sinha
1Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
2Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering (IBSE), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
7Robert Bosch Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (RBCDSAI), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shinjini.bhatnagar@thsti.res.in sinha@iitm.ac.in
Shinjini Bhatnagar
3Maternal and Child Health Program, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
4Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes - DBT India Initiative, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shinjini.bhatnagar@thsti.res.in sinha@iitm.ac.in
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Different formulae have been developed globally for estimation of gestational age (GA) by ultrasonography in the first trimester of pregnancy. In this study, we develop an Indian population-specific dating formula and compare its performance with published formulae. Finally, we evaluate the implications of the choice of dating method on preterm birth (PTB) rate. The data for this study was from GARBH-Ini, an ongoing pregnancy cohort of North Indian women to study PTB.

Methods Comparisons between ultrasonography-Hadlock and last menstrual period (LMP) based dating methods were made by studying the distribution of their differences by Bland-Altman analysis. Using data driven approaches, we removed data outliers more efficiently than by applying clinical parameters. We applied advanced machine learning algorithms to identify relevant features for GA estimation and developed an Indian population-specific formula (Garbhini-1) for the first trimester. PTB rates of Garbhini-1 and other formulae were compared by estimating sensitivity and accuracy.

Results Performance of Garbhini-1 formula, a non-linear function of crown-rump length (CRL), was equivalent to published formulae for estimation of first trimester GA (limits of agreement, −46,0.96 weeks). We found that CRL was the most important parameter in estimating GA and no other clinical or socioeconomic covariates contributed to GA estimation. The estimated PTB rate across all the formulae including LMP ranged 11.54-16.50% with Garbhini-1 estimating the least rate with highest sensitivity and accuracy. While LMP-based method overestimated GA by three days compared to USG-Hadlock formula; at an individual level, these methods had less than 50% agreement in classification of PTB.

Conclusions An accurate estimation of GA is crucial for management of PTB. Garbhini-1, the first such formula developed in an Indian setting, estimates PTB rates with higher accuracy especially when compared to commonly used Hadlock formula. Our results reinforce the need to develop population-specific gestational age formulae.

Study question

  • Is there a need for an Indian population-specific GA estimation model?

  • Do clinical and socioeconomic features affect the estimation of GA in the Indian population?

  • Does the choice of a dating model affect the classification of PTB?

What is already known

  • Several first trimester GA estimation formulae have been published based on different population globally.

  • In India, CRL-based Hadlock’s formula, based on a US population, is primarily used for GA estimation.

What this study adds

  • We have developed an Indian population-specific formula (Garbhini-1) for GA estimation in the first trimester.

  • Garbhini-1 performs comparably to other published formulae in estimating GA with the highest balanced accuracy in classifying PTB.

  • Other clinical and socioeconomic features do not improve the accuracy of the first trimester dating.

  • Our results reinforce the need to develop population-specific GA formulae.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by an alumni endowment from Dr. Prakash Arunachalam to the Initiative for Biological Systems Engineering, IIT Madras (BIO/18-19/304/ALUM/KARH). GARBH-Ini cohort study is funded by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (BT/PR9983/MED/97/194/2013) and for some components of the biorepository by the Grand Challenges India-All Children Thriving Program (supported by the Programme Management Unit), Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (BIRAC/GCI/0114/03/14-ACT).

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All supplementary data used in the manuscript is submitted. Primary data can be shared according to the GARBH-Ini data sharing policy which available on request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 09, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort
Ramya Vijayram, Nikhita Damaraju, Ashley Xavier, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Sumit Misra, Shilpa Chopra, Ashok Khurana, Nitya Wadhwa, GARBH-Ini, Raghunathan Rengaswamy, Himanshu Sinha, Shinjini Bhatnagar
medRxiv 2019.12.27.19016006; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.27.19016006
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort
Ramya Vijayram, Nikhita Damaraju, Ashley Xavier, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam, Sumit Misra, Shilpa Chopra, Ashok Khurana, Nitya Wadhwa, GARBH-Ini, Raghunathan Rengaswamy, Himanshu Sinha, Shinjini Bhatnagar
medRxiv 2019.12.27.19016006; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.27.19016006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (46)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (415)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (70)
  • Dermatology (48)
  • Emergency Medicine (144)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4860)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (183)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (676)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (192)
  • Health Informatics (630)
  • Health Policy (320)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (206)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (156)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5341)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (331)
  • Medical Education (93)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (75)
  • Neurology (686)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (115)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (126)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (208)
  • Oncology (439)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (90)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (16)
  • Pathology (129)
  • Pediatrics (194)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (780)
  • Public and Global Health (1816)
  • Radiology and Imaging (325)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (62)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (37)