Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in applied health research: review and recommendations

View ORCID ProfilePeter WG Tennant, View ORCID ProfileWendy J Harrison, View ORCID ProfileEleanor J Murray, View ORCID ProfileKellyn F Arnold, Laurie Berrie, Matthew P Fox, View ORCID ProfileSarah C Gadd, View ORCID ProfileClaire Keeble, Lynsie R Ranker, View ORCID ProfileJohannes Textor, Georgia D Tomova, View ORCID ProfileMark S Gilthorpe, View ORCID ProfileGeorge TH Ellison
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.20.19015511
Peter WG Tennant
1Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK
3Alan Turing Institute, British Library, London, NW1 2DB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter WG Tennant
  • For correspondence: peter.tennant@leeds.ac.uk
Wendy J Harrison
1Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Wendy J Harrison
Eleanor J Murray
4Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eleanor J Murray
Kellyn F Arnold
1Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kellyn F Arnold
Laurie Berrie
1Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK
5School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew P Fox
6Departments of Epidemiology and Global Health, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah C Gadd
1Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
7School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah C Gadd
Claire Keeble
1Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claire Keeble
Lynsie R Ranker
4Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Textor
8Department of Tumour Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Johannes Textor
Georgia D Tomova
1Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK
3Alan Turing Institute, British Library, London, NW1 2DB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark S Gilthorpe
1Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK
3Alan Turing Institute, British Library, London, NW1 2DB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark S Gilthorpe
George TH Ellison
1Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
2Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for George TH Ellison
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are an increasingly popular approach for identifying confounding variables that require adjustment when estimating causal effects. This review examined the use of DAGs in applied health research to inform recommendations for improving their transparency and utility in future research.

Methods Original health research articles published during 1999-2017 mentioning “directed acyclic graphs” or similar or citing DAGitty were identified from Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, and Embase. Data were extracted on the reporting of: estimands, DAGs, and adjustment sets, alongside the characteristics of each article’s largest DAG.

Results A total of 234 articles were identified that reported using DAGs. A fifth (n=48, 21%) reported their target estimand(s) and half (n=115, 48%) reported the adjustment set(s) implied by their DAG(s).

Two-thirds of the articles (n=144, 62%) made at least one DAG available. Diagrams varied in size but averaged 12 nodes (IQR: 9-16, range: 3-28) and 29 arcs (IQR: 19-42, range: 3-99). The median saturation (i.e. percentage of total possible arcs) was 46% (IQR: 31-67, range: 12-100). 37% (n=53) of the DAGs included unobserved variables, 17% (n=25) included super-nodes (i.e. nodes containing more than one variable, and a 34% (n=49) were arranged so the constituent arcs flowed in a consistent direction.

Conclusions There is substantial variation in the use and reporting of DAGs in applied health research. Although this partly reflects their flexibility, it also highlight some potential areas for improvement. This review hence offers several recommendations to improve the reporting and use of DAGs in future research.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study received no specific funding. KFA and SCG are grateful for PhD funding from the Economic and Social Research Council, UK (ES/J500215/1 and ES/P000746/1, respectively). LB is grateful for PhD funding from the Medical Research Council, UK (MR/K501402/1). GDT is grateful for PhD funding from The Alan Turing Institute [EP/N510129/1]. MSG and PWGT are both supported by The Alan Turing Institute [EP/N510129/1].

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data provided directly in supplementary material

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 27, 2019.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in applied health research: review and recommendations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in applied health research: review and recommendations
Peter WG Tennant, Wendy J Harrison, Eleanor J Murray, Kellyn F Arnold, Laurie Berrie, Matthew P Fox, Sarah C Gadd, Claire Keeble, Lynsie R Ranker, Johannes Textor, Georgia D Tomova, Mark S Gilthorpe, George TH Ellison
medRxiv 2019.12.20.19015511; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.20.19015511
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in applied health research: review and recommendations
Peter WG Tennant, Wendy J Harrison, Eleanor J Murray, Kellyn F Arnold, Laurie Berrie, Matthew P Fox, Sarah C Gadd, Claire Keeble, Lynsie R Ranker, Johannes Textor, Georgia D Tomova, Mark S Gilthorpe, George TH Ellison
medRxiv 2019.12.20.19015511; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.20.19015511

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (179)
  • Allergy and Immunology (433)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (948)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (109)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (420)
  • Epidemiology (8982)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (419)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1949)
  • Geriatric Medicine (190)
  • Health Economics (401)
  • Health Informatics (1328)
  • Health Policy (659)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (519)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (420)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10799)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (575)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (222)
  • Neurology (1825)
  • Nursing (109)
  • Nutrition (272)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (353)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (470)
  • Oncology (997)
  • Ophthalmology (297)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (182)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (579)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (275)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1896)
  • Public and Global Health (4120)
  • Radiology and Imaging (675)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (368)
  • Respiratory Medicine (548)
  • Rheumatology (224)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (190)
  • Sports Medicine (177)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (39)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (80)