Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Protocol for an observational study evaluating new approaches to modelling diagnostic information from large administrative hospital datasets

View ORCID ProfileThomas E Cowling, View ORCID ProfileDavid A Cromwell, View ORCID ProfileLinda D Sharples, View ORCID ProfileJan van der Meulen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19011338
Thomas E Cowling
1Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, UK
3Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, UK
Roles: Assistant Professor in Clinical Epidemiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas E Cowling
  • For correspondence: thomas.cowling@lshtm.ac.uk
David A Cromwell
1Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, UK
3Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, UK
Roles: Professor of Health Services Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David A Cromwell
Linda D Sharples
2Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, UK
Roles: Professor of Medical Statistics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Linda D Sharples
Jan van der Meulen
1Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, UK
3Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, UK
Roles: Professor of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jan van der Meulen
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction The Charlson and Elixhauser indices define sets of conditions used to adjust for patients’ comorbidities in administrative hospital data. A strength of these indices is the parsimony that results from including only 19 and 30 conditions respectively, but the conditions included may not be the ones most relevant to a specific outcome and population. Our objectives are to: (1) test an approach to developing parsimonious indices for the specific outcome and populations being studied, while comparing performance to the Charlson and Elixhauser indices; and (2) evaluate several approaches that involve models with more diagnosis-related terms and aim to improve prediction performance by capturing more of the information in large datasets.

Methods and analysis This is a modelling study using a linked national dataset of administrative hospital records and death records. The study populations are patients admitted to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, hip fracture, or major surgery for colorectal cancer in England between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017. The outcome is death within 365 days of the date of admission (acute myocardial infarction and hip fracture) or procedure (colorectal surgery). In the ‘First analysis’, prognostic indices will be developed based on the presence/absence of individual ICD-10 codes in patients’ medical histories. Logistic regression will be used to estimate associations with a full set of sociodemographic and diagnostic predictors from which reduced models (with fewer diagnostic predictors) will be produced using a step-down approach. In the ‘Second analysis’, models will also account for the timing that each ICD-10 code was last recorded and allow for non-linear relationships and interactions between conditions and the timings of records. Validation will include an overall measure of performance (scaled Brier score) and measures of discrimination (c-statistic) and calibration (such as the Integrated Calibration Index) in bootstrap or cross-validation samples. Sensitivity analyses will include varying the length of medical history analysed, using a comparator that combines the Charlson and Elixhauser sets of conditions, and aggregating ICD-10 codes into clinical groups.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a Medical Research Council fellowship awarded to TEC (grant number: MR/S020470/1).

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

No additional data are available.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 08, 2019.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protocol for an observational study evaluating new approaches to modelling diagnostic information from large administrative hospital datasets
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Protocol for an observational study evaluating new approaches to modelling diagnostic information from large administrative hospital datasets
Thomas E Cowling, David A Cromwell, Linda D Sharples, Jan van der Meulen
medRxiv 19011338; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19011338
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Protocol for an observational study evaluating new approaches to modelling diagnostic information from large administrative hospital datasets
Thomas E Cowling, David A Cromwell, Linda D Sharples, Jan van der Meulen
medRxiv 19011338; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19011338

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (214)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1090)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (194)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (497)
  • Epidemiology (9746)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (480)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2298)
  • Geriatric Medicine (221)
  • Health Economics (461)
  • Health Informatics (1548)
  • Health Policy (729)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (600)
  • Hematology (236)
  • HIV/AIDS (500)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11618)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (615)
  • Medical Education (236)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (256)
  • Neurology (2136)
  • Nursing (133)
  • Nutrition (332)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (424)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (516)
  • Oncology (1171)
  • Ophthalmology (363)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (144)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (308)
  • Pediatrics (692)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (298)
  • Primary Care Research (265)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2168)
  • Public and Global Health (4640)
  • Radiology and Imaging (775)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (450)
  • Respiratory Medicine (621)
  • Rheumatology (273)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (224)
  • Sports Medicine (208)
  • Surgery (250)
  • Toxicology (42)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)