Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Physicians’ learning in the workplace: use of informal feedback cues in daily practice

View ORCID ProfileCarolin Sehlbach, View ORCID ProfilePim W Teunissen, View ORCID ProfileErik W Driessen, Sharon Mitchell, View ORCID ProfileGernot GU Rohde, View ORCID ProfileFrank WJM Smeenk, Marjan JB Govaerts
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19010926
Carolin Sehlbach
1Maastricht University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Carolin Sehlbach
  • For correspondence: carolin.sehlbach@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Pim W Teunissen
1Maastricht University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pim W Teunissen
Erik W Driessen
1Maastricht University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erik W Driessen
Sharon Mitchell
2World Heart Federation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gernot GU Rohde
3University Hospital, Goethe University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gernot GU Rohde
Frank WJM Smeenk
1Maastricht University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Frank WJM Smeenk
Marjan JB Govaerts
1Maastricht University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Purpose We expect physicians to be lifelong learners. Learning from clinical practice is an important potential source for that learning. To support physicians in this process, a better understanding of how they learn in clinical practice is necessary. This study investigates how physicians use informal feedback as learning cues to adjust their communication from interactions with patients in the outpatient setting.

Methods To understand physicians’ use of informal feedback, we combined non-participant ethnographic observations with semi-structured interviews. We enrolled 10 respiratory physicians and observed 100 physician-patient interactions at one academic and one non-academic hospital in the Netherlands. Data collection and analysis were performed iteratively according to the principles of constructivist grounded theory. Our conceptual model describes how physicians use cues to reflect on and adjust their communication as well as to further develop their adaptive expertise.

Results In addition to vast variations within and across patient encounters, we observed recurring patterns in physicians’ communications in reaction to specific learning cues. Physicians had learnt to recognise and use different cues to adjust their communication in patient encounters. They established a ‘communication repertoire’ based on multiple patient interactions, which many saw as learning opportunities, contributing to the development of adaptive expertise. Our findings show differences in physicians’ sensitivity to recognising learning opportunities in daily practice which was further influenced by contextual, personal and interpersonal factors. Whereas some reported to have little inclination to change, others used critical incidents to fine-tune their communication repertoire, while others constantly reshaped it, seeking learning opportunities in their daily work.

Conclusions There is a large variation in how physicians use learning cues from daily practice. Learning from daily practice is a collaborative effort and requires a culture that promotes lifelong learning. Raising physicians’ awareness of experiences as potential learning opportunities might enhance their development of adaptive expertise.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The European Respiratory Society funded this study. However, Carolin Sehlbach, who was appointed to the research project as a PhD student at Maastricht University conducted the research independently of this funding. The European Respiratory Society had no role in the design or conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation or approval of the manuscript or the decision to submit for publication.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 02, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physicians’ learning in the workplace: use of informal feedback cues in daily practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Physicians’ learning in the workplace: use of informal feedback cues in daily practice
Carolin Sehlbach, Pim W Teunissen, Erik W Driessen, Sharon Mitchell, Gernot GU Rohde, Frank WJM Smeenk, Marjan JB Govaerts
medRxiv 19010926; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19010926
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Physicians’ learning in the workplace: use of informal feedback cues in daily practice
Carolin Sehlbach, Pim W Teunissen, Erik W Driessen, Sharon Mitchell, Gernot GU Rohde, Frank WJM Smeenk, Marjan JB Govaerts
medRxiv 19010926; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19010926

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Medical Education
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (50)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (451)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5258)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (195)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (757)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (213)
  • Health Informatics (698)
  • Health Policy (358)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (223)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (163)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5867)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (361)
  • Medical Education (104)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (764)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (130)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (142)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
  • Oncology (479)
  • Ophthalmology (152)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (95)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (862)
  • Public and Global Health (2011)
  • Radiology and Imaging (348)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
  • Respiratory Medicine (285)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (76)
  • Surgery (109)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)