ABSTRACT
Aim To understand patient/family perspective of inappropriate intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and treatment.
Methods Rapid literature review of English language articles published between 2001 and 2017 in Medline or PsycInfo.
Results Thirteen articles covering 6,194 elderly patients or surrogate decision-makers from four countries were eligible. Perceived inappropriateness of ICU treatments was mainly expressed as dissatisfaction with clinicians’ as surrogate decision-makers, inconsistency with patient/family values, family distrust of physician’s predictions on poor prognosis, and inadequate communication on over-aggressive treatment causing suffering. Consultation on opinion before ICU admission varied from 1% to 53.6%, and treatment goals from 1.4 to 31.7%. Satisfaction with the decision-making process in ICU was higher for those who had certain level of control and involvement in the process.
Conclusions The patient/family perspective on inappropriateness of ICU treatments involves preferences, values and social constructs beyond medical criteria. Earlier consultation with families before ICU admission, and patient education on outcomes of life-sustaining therapies may help reconcile these provider-patient disagreements.
Take-home message The patient/family perspective on inappropriateness of ICU at the end of life often differs from the clinician’s opinion due to the non-medical frame of mind. To improve satisfaction with communication on treatment goals, consultation on patient values and inclusion of social constructs in addition to clinical prediction are a good start to reconcile differences between physician and health service users’ viewpoint.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a program grant from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [#1054146]. The funding body had no role in the conduct, interpretation or release of this work. Authors did not receive payment for their contributions other than their regular salaries.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Not Applicable
Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
mcardona{at}bond.edu.au
Shantiba.Shanmugam{at}health.nsw.gov.au
ebony.lewis{at}unsw.edu.au
Alex.Psirides{at}ccdhb.org.nz
Matthew.Anstey{at}health.wa.gov.au
k.hillman{at}unsw.edu.au
Data Availability
All data available is presented including supplement