Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Modified Long-Axis In-Plane Ultrasound Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Ultrasound For Radial Arterial Cannulation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Jiebo Wang, Liangcheng Zhang, Qijian Huang, Zhongmeng Lai, Guohua Wu, Lei Lin, Junle Liu, Xianfeng Weng
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19005496
Jiebo Wang
Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liangcheng Zhang
Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lczhang20160621@sina.com
Qijian Huang
Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhongmeng Lai
Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guohua Wu
Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lei Lin
Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junle Liu
Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xianfeng Weng
Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND Given a low first-pass success rate of the conventional SAX (short-axis) or LAX (long-axis) approach, ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in adults with radial artery diameter less than 2.2 mm may be still challenging.

OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of modified long-axis in-plane(M-LAIP) versus short-axis out-of-plane (SAOP) or conventional palpation(C-P) approaches for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation.

DESIGN A prospective, randomized and controlled trial.

SETTING Operating room in a tertiary university hospital, from 1 July 2018 to 24 November 2018.

PATIENTS A total of 201 patients (age 18 to 85 years, the diameter of the radial artery less 2.2 mm) were included. Patients with history of forearm surgery, ulnar artery occlusion, abnormal Allen test, etc, were excluded from this study.

INTERVENTIONS All patients were randomized 1:1:1 to M-LAIP, SAOP or C-P.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the cannulation success rate. Secondary outcomes included first location time and cannulation time, number of attempts.

RESULTS The cannulation success rate was significantly higher in the M-LAIP group than in the SAOP group or C-P group (first success rate: 80.3% vs 53.8% or 33.8%; p =0.000; total success rate: 93.9% vs 78.5% or 50.8%; p =0.000). First location time (s) was significantly longer in the M-LAIP group compared with the SAOP group (31(28-35[12-44]) vs 15(14-17[10-21]); p =0.000) and the C-P group (31(28-35[12-44]) vs 12(8-13.5 [6-37]); p =0.000). However, the time of cannulation in the M-LAIP group (29(24-45[16-313])) was significantly shorter than that in the SAOP group (45(28.5-135.5[14-346]), p =0.002) and in the C-P group(138(27-308[12-363]), p =0.000). The number of attempts decreased in the M-LAIP group compared with SAOP or C-P group (1.29±0.63 vs 1.8±0.89 or 2.22±0.93, p =0.000).

CONCLUSION The M-LAIP procedure for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation can offer a higher success rate of the first-attempt and total cannulation, fewer attempts and less time of cannulation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, number: ChiCTR-IOR-17011474).

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (http: // www. chictr.org. cn/index.aspx, number: ChiCTR-IOR-17011474).

Funding Statement

Financial support and sponsorship: This work was supported in part by Fujian Province Science and Technology Innovation Joint Fund Project of China(2017Y9008) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 81641038).

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data can be searched on Resman clinical trial public manage web.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 04, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Modified Long-Axis In-Plane Ultrasound Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Ultrasound For Radial Arterial Cannulation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Modified Long-Axis In-Plane Ultrasound Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Ultrasound For Radial Arterial Cannulation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Jiebo Wang, Liangcheng Zhang, Qijian Huang, Zhongmeng Lai, Guohua Wu, Lei Lin, Junle Liu, Xianfeng Weng
medRxiv 19005496; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19005496
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Modified Long-Axis In-Plane Ultrasound Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Ultrasound For Radial Arterial Cannulation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Jiebo Wang, Liangcheng Zhang, Qijian Huang, Zhongmeng Lai, Guohua Wu, Lei Lin, Junle Liu, Xianfeng Weng
medRxiv 19005496; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19005496

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Anesthesia
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (174)
  • Allergy and Immunology (419)
  • Anesthesia (97)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (894)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (166)
  • Dermatology (101)
  • Emergency Medicine (257)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (404)
  • Epidemiology (8745)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (403)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1845)
  • Geriatric Medicine (175)
  • Health Economics (386)
  • Health Informatics (1282)
  • Health Policy (642)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (489)
  • Hematology (206)
  • HIV/AIDS (387)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10521)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (52)
  • Nephrology (216)
  • Neurology (1744)
  • Nursing (100)
  • Nutrition (264)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (342)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (457)
  • Oncology (959)
  • Ophthalmology (279)
  • Orthopedics (107)
  • Otolaryngology (174)
  • Pain Medicine (117)
  • Palliative Medicine (41)
  • Pathology (262)
  • Pediatrics (553)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (264)
  • Primary Care Research (218)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1836)
  • Public and Global Health (3963)
  • Radiology and Imaging (649)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (340)
  • Respiratory Medicine (532)
  • Rheumatology (214)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
  • Sports Medicine (165)
  • Surgery (196)
  • Toxicology (37)
  • Transplantation (105)
  • Urology (78)