Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature

View ORCID ProfileJ. Michael Anderson, Bryan Wright, Daniel Tritz, Jarryd Horn, Ian Parker, Daniel Bergeron, Sharolyn Cook, Matt Vassar
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19002121
J. Michael Anderson
1Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Michael Anderson
  • For correspondence: jande31@okstate.edu
Bryan Wright
1Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Tritz
1Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jarryd Horn
1Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Parker
2Oklahoma State University Medical Center - Department of Cardiology, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Bergeron
2Oklahoma State University Medical Center - Department of Cardiology, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharolyn Cook
2Oklahoma State University Medical Center - Department of Cardiology, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matt Vassar
1Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The extent of reproducibility in cardiology research remains unclear. Therefore, our main objective was to determine the quality of research published in cardiology journals using eight indicators of reproducibility.

Methods Using a cross-sectional study design, we conducted an advanced search of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) catalog for publications from 2014-2018 in journals pertaining to cardiology. Journals must have been published in the English language and must have been indexed in MEDLINE. Once the initial list of publications from all cardiology journals was obtained, we searched for full-text PDF versions using Open Access, Google Scholar, and PubMed. Studies were analyzed using a pilot-tested Google Form to evaluate the presence of information that was deemed necessary to reproduce the study in its entirety.

Results After exclusions, we included 132 studies containing empirical data. Of these studies, the majority (126/132, 95.5%) did not provide the raw data collected while conducting the study, 0/132 (0%) provided step-by-step analysis scripts, and 117/132 (88.6%) failed to provide sufficient materials needed to reproduce the study.

Conclusions The presentation of studies published in cardiology journals does not appear to facilitate reproducible research. Considerable improvements to the framework of biomedical science, specifically in the field of cardiology, are necessary. Solutions to increase the reproducibility and transparency of published works in cardiology journals is warranted, including addressing inadequate sharing of materials, raw data, and key methodological details.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://osf.io/x24n3/

Funding Statement

This study was funded through the 2019 Presidential Research Fellowship Mentor ? Mentee Program at Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Not Applicable

Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.

Not Applicable

Data Availability

Since the Open Science Framework has generated a new infrastructure that advocates for research transparency, we have supplied our complete protocol, raw data, and other necessary materials at https://osf.io/x24n3/.

https://osf.io/x24n3/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 15, 2019.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature
J. Michael Anderson, Bryan Wright, Daniel Tritz, Jarryd Horn, Ian Parker, Daniel Bergeron, Sharolyn Cook, Matt Vassar
medRxiv 19002121; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19002121
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature
J. Michael Anderson, Bryan Wright, Daniel Tritz, Jarryd Horn, Ian Parker, Daniel Bergeron, Sharolyn Cook, Matt Vassar
medRxiv 19002121; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19002121

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (141)
  • Anesthesia (44)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (408)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (67)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (141)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4809)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (177)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (671)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (187)
  • Health Informatics (621)
  • Health Policy (314)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (200)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (155)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5280)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (326)
  • Medical Education (91)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (73)
  • Neurology (677)
  • Nursing (41)
  • Nutrition (110)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (124)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (203)
  • Oncology (438)
  • Ophthalmology (138)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (88)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (15)
  • Pathology (127)
  • Pediatrics (193)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (129)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (767)
  • Public and Global Health (1796)
  • Radiology and Imaging (321)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (68)
  • Sports Medicine (61)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (28)
  • Urology (37)