Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The global scientific research response to the public health emergency of Zika virus infection

Juliane Fonseca de Oliveira, Julia Moreira Pescarini, Moreno de Souza Rodrigues, Bethania de Araujo Almeida, Claudio Maierovitch Pessanha Henriques, Fabio Castro Gouveia, Elaine Teixeira Rabello, Gustavo Correa Matta, Mauricio L. Barreto, Ricardo Barros Sampaio
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19001313
Juliane Fonseca de Oliveira
1Centro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Fiocruz, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Moreira Pescarini
1Centro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Fiocruz, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moreno de Souza Rodrigues
1Centro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Fiocruz, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
2Laboratório de Análise e Visualização de dados, Fiocruz, Rondônia, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bethania de Araujo Almeida
1Centro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Fiocruz, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudio Maierovitch Pessanha Henriques
3Gerência Regional de Brasília, Fiocruz, Brasília, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Castro Gouveia
4Casa Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elaine Teixeira Rabello
5Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gustavo Correa Matta
6Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mauricio L. Barreto
1Centro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Fiocruz, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
7Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo Barros Sampaio
1Centro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Fiocruz, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
3Gerência Regional de Brasília, Fiocruz, Brasília, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rsampaio.br@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Science studies have been a field of research for different knowledge areas and they have been successfully used to analyse the construction of scientific knowledge, practice and dissemination. In this study, we aimed to verify how the Zika epidemic has moulded scientific production worldwide analysing international collaboration and the knowledge landscape through time, research topics and country involvement.

Methodology We searched the Web of Science (WoS) for studies published up to 31st December 2018 on Zika using the search terms “zika”, “zkv” or “zikv”. We analysed the scientific production regarding which countries have published the most, on which topics, as well as country level collaboration. We performed a scientometric analysis of research on Zika focusing on knowledge mapping and the scientific research path over time and space.

Findings We found two well defined research areas divided into three subtopics accounting for six clusters. With regard to country analysis, the USA followed by Brazil were the leading countries in publications on Zika. China entered as a new player focusing on specific research areas. When we took into consideration the epidemics and reported cases, Brazil and France were the leading research countries on related topics. As for international collaboration, the USA followed by England and France stand out as the main hubs. The research areas most published included public health related topics from 2015 until the very beginning of 2016, followed by an increase in topics related to the clinical aspects of the disease in 2016 and the beginnings of laboratorial research in 2017/2018.

Conclusions Mapping the response to Zika, a public health emergency, demonstrated a clear pattern of the participation of countries in the scientific advances. The pattern of knowledge production found in this study represented the different perspectives and interests of countries based firstly on their level of exposure to the epidemic and secondly on their financial positions with regard to science.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work is supported by the Center of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS) through the Zika Platform- a long-term surveillance platform for the Zika virus and microcephaly, Unified Health System (SUS) - Brazilian Ministry of Health. This work was partially supported by the European Union?s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under ZIKAlliance Grant Agreement no.734548, and by the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation/ Vice-Presidency of Research and Biological Collections-Fiocruz/ VPPCB and the Newton Fund/British Council.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Not Applicable

Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 16, 2019.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The global scientific research response to the public health emergency of Zika virus infection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The global scientific research response to the public health emergency of Zika virus infection
Juliane Fonseca de Oliveira, Julia Moreira Pescarini, Moreno de Souza Rodrigues, Bethania de Araujo Almeida, Claudio Maierovitch Pessanha Henriques, Fabio Castro Gouveia, Elaine Teixeira Rabello, Gustavo Correa Matta, Mauricio L. Barreto, Ricardo Barros Sampaio
medRxiv 19001313; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19001313
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The global scientific research response to the public health emergency of Zika virus infection
Juliane Fonseca de Oliveira, Julia Moreira Pescarini, Moreno de Souza Rodrigues, Bethania de Araujo Almeida, Claudio Maierovitch Pessanha Henriques, Fabio Castro Gouveia, Elaine Teixeira Rabello, Gustavo Correa Matta, Mauricio L. Barreto, Ricardo Barros Sampaio
medRxiv 19001313; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19001313

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (44)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (409)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (68)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (141)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4818)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (177)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (671)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (188)
  • Health Informatics (621)
  • Health Policy (314)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (200)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (155)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5287)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (327)
  • Medical Education (91)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (73)
  • Neurology (677)
  • Nursing (41)
  • Nutrition (112)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (126)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (203)
  • Oncology (439)
  • Ophthalmology (138)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (89)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (15)
  • Pathology (128)
  • Pediatrics (193)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (129)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (771)
  • Public and Global Health (1800)
  • Radiology and Imaging (322)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (61)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (28)
  • Urology (37)