PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S.
AU  - Killingley, Ben
AU  - Enstone, Joanne
AU  - Hewitt, Michael
AU  - Pantelic, Jovan
AU  - Grantham, Michael L.
AU  - de Mesquita, P. Jacob Bueno
AU  - Lambkin-Williams, Robert
AU  - Gilbert, Anthony
AU  - Mann, Alexander
AU  - Forni, John
AU  - Noakes, Catherine J.
AU  - Levine, Min Z.
AU  - Berman, LaShondra
AU  - Lindstrom, Stephen
AU  - Cauchemez, Simon
AU  - Bischoff, Werner
AU  - Tellier, Raymond
AU  - Milton, Donald K.
AU  - ,
TI  - Minimal transmission in an influenza A (H3N2) human challenge-transmission model within a controlled exposure environment
AID  - 10.1101/2019.12.13.19014381
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2019.12.13.19014381
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/06/2019.12.13.19014381.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/06/2019.12.13.19014381.full
AB  - Uncertainty about the importance of influenza transmission by airborne droplet nuclei generates controversy for infection control. Human challenge-transmission studies have been supported as the most promising approach to fill this knowledge gap. Healthy, seronegative volunteer ‘Donors’ (n=52) were randomly selected for intranasal challenge with influenza A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2). ‘Recipients’ randomized to Intervention (IR, n=40) or Control (CR, n=35) groups were exposed to Donors for four days. IRs wore face shields and hand sanitized frequently to limit large droplet and contact transmission. One transmitted infection was confirmed by serology in a CR, yielding a secondary attack rate of 2.9% among CR, 0% in IR (p=0.47 for group difference), and 1.3% overall, significantly less than 16% (p<0.001) expected based on a proof-of-concept study secondary attack rate and considering that there were twice as many Donors and days of exposure. The main difference between these studies was mechanical building ventilation in the follow-on study, suggesting a possible role for aerosols.Author summary Understanding the relative importance of influenza modes of transmission informs strategic use of preventive measures to reduce influenza risk in high-risk settings such as hospitals and is important for pandemic preparedness. Given the increasing evidence from epidemiological modelling, exhaled viral aerosol, and aerobiological survival studies supporting a role for airborne transmission and the potential benefit of respirators (and other precautions designed to prevent inhalation of aerosols) versus surgical masks (mainly effective for reducing exposure to large droplets) to protect healthcare workers, more studies are needed to evaluate the extent of risk posed airborne versus contact and large droplet spray transmission modes. New human challenge-transmission studies should be carefully designed to overcome limitations encountered in the current study. The low secondary attack rate reported herein also suggests that the current challenge-transmission model may no longer be a more promising approach to resolving questions about transmission modes than community-based studies employing environmental monitoring and newer, state-of-the-art deep sequencing-based molecular epidemiological methods.Competing Interest StatementJSN-V-T and BK declare previous consultancy fees from H-Vivo plc, unrelated to the current work. JSN-V-T is currently seconded to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), England; the views expressed in this paper are not necessarily those of DHSC. RLW, AG and AM are employees of H-Vivo plc each of whom hold shares and /or share options in the company.Clinical TrialNCT01710111Funding StatementThis work was supported by U.S. CDC, Cooperative Agreement: Grant Number 1U01P000497-01. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agency.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData required for reproduction of analyses is available upon request. Scripts and other documentation to reproduce analyses are available at Digital Repositories at the University of Maryland (13) and https://gitlab.com/jacobbueno/emit_quarantine_main. http://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/25315