RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 What level of neutralising antibody protects from COVID-19?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.09.21252641
DO 10.1101/2021.03.09.21252641
A1 David S Khoury
A1 Deborah Cromer
A1 Arnold Reynaldi
A1 Timothy E Schlub
A1 Adam K Wheatley
A1 Jennifer A Juno
A1 Kanta Subbarao
A1 Stephen J Kent
A1 James A Triccas
A1 Miles P Davenport
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/11/2021.03.09.21252641.abstract
AB Both previous infection and vaccination have been shown to provide potent protection from COVID-19. However, there are concerns that waning immunity and viral variation may lead to a loss of protection over time. Predictive models of immune protection are urgently needed to identify immune correlates of protection to assist in the future deployment of vaccines. To address this, we modelled the relationship between in vitro neutralisation levels and observed protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection using data from seven current vaccines as well as convalescent cohorts. Here we show that neutralisation level is highly predictive of immune protection. The 50% protective neutralisation level was estimated to be approximately 20% of the average convalescent level (95% CI = 14-28%). The estimated neutralisation level required for 50% protection from severe infection was significantly lower (3% of the mean convalescent level (CI = 0.7-13%, p = 0.0004). Given the relationship between in vitro neutralization titer and protection, we then used this to investigate how waning immunity and antigenic variation might affect vaccine efficacy. We found that the decay of neutralising titre in vaccinated subjects over the first 3-4 months after vaccination was at least as rapid as the decay observed in convalescent subjects. Modelling the decay of neutralisation titre over the first 250 days after immunisation predicts a significant loss in protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection will occur, although protection from severe disease should be largely retained. Neutralisation titres against some SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are reduced compared to the vaccine strain and our model predicts the relationship between neutralisation and efficacy against viral variants. Our analyses provide an evidence-based prediction of SARS-CoV-2 immune protection that will assist in developing vaccine strategies to control the future trajectory of the pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is supported by an Australian government Medical Research Future Fund awards GNT2002073 (SJK, MPD, and AKW), MRF2005544 (to SJK, AKW, JAJ and MPD), MRF2005760 (to MPD), an NHMRC program grant APP1149990 (SJK and MPD), the Victorian Government (SJK, AKW, JAJ), and Emergent Ventures Fast Grants (AWC). JAJ, DSK and SJK are supported by NHMRC fellowships. AKW, DC and MPD are supported by NHMRC Investigator grants. This study was supported by the Jack Ma Foundation (KS) and the A2 Milk Company (KS). The Melbourne WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza is supported by the Australian Government Department of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This work was approved under the UNSW Human Research Ethics Committee (approval HC200242).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is freely available upon request after publication.